Fluid power cylinders manufacturing · Nebraska

Main Plant

Columbus, NE · ~154 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

Main Plant runs at 210% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fluid power cylinders manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.9
avg TCR · per 100 workers
3.3
industry benchmark (BLS)
53
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares Main Plant's OSHA Total Case Rate of 6.9 to the Fluid power cylinders manufacturing BLS benchmark of 3.3 (210% of benchmark) across 5 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.

Injury rate over time

Main Plant's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.

24681012 20182019202120222023 9.83.3 Industry benchmarkMain Plant TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 333995.

Where Main Plant falls in its industry

154 Fluid power cylinders manufact establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Trend analysis for Main Plant

Between 2018 and 2023, Main Plant's Total Case Rate worsened from 4.4 to 9.8 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 123% increase across 5 years of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2018, at a TCR of 4.4, while 2023 saw the highest rate, at 9.8, a spread of 5.4 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.

Summed across those 5 reporting years, Main Plant recorded 53 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 5-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

The 53 injuries, 5 illnesses shown on this page for Main Plant are sourced from its own 5 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 333995 - Fluid power cylinders manufacturing.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2023)

What is the DART rate formula?

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

12 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 369,354 hours worked = 6.50 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
Main Plant (this establishment) 6.93 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 5-year avg
Hydraulic cylinders, fluid power, manufacturing industry avg 3.30 BLS IIF, NAICS 333995
Nebraska state avg (all industries) 4.84 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Main Plant to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 9.8 6.5 18 0 0
2022 6.0 3.6 10 0 0
2021 8.7 5.6 11 3 0
2019 5.9 3.3 8 1 0
2018 4.4 2.5 6 1 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on Main Plant's reported OSHA injury record versus its Fluid power cylinders manufacturing peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.

  • At 210% of the Fluid power cylinders manufacturing benchmark, Main Plant reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider Fluid power cylinders manufacturing sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Main Plant's safety grade?
Main Plant has a safety grade of F (Failing Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 6.9 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 3.3 for Fluid power cylinders manufacturing.
How many injuries has Main Plant reported?
Main Plant has reported 53 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 5 years of OSHA data (2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Nebraska, and by nearby establishments in Columbus - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Similar TCR (~6.9)

Similar size (~154 workers)

Nearby in Columbus

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.