Building cleaning services, janitorial · Texas

Maintenance of Austin, Inc.

Austin, TX · ~31 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maintenance of Austin, Inc. runs at 132% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Building cleaning services, janitorial workplace, earning a grade D.

Maintenance of Austin, Inc.: 6.0 TCR = 132% of Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maintenance of Austin, Inc. safety composite

Maintenance of Austin, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2016→2024

Maintenance of Austin, Inc. injury rate improved

Maintenance of Austin, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.4 from 6.4 in 2016 to 3.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 13.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=13.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=7.0 · 2023=11.1 · 2024=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Austin, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 132% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #340/417
  • PHOTO Hospital Metropolita…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hospital Metropolitano de San German (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Maintenance of Austin, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maintenance of Austin, Inc. averages 6.0 TCR (132% of the Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maintenance of Austin, Inc. TCR series: 2016=6.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=13.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=7 · 2023=11.1 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 4.5

Where Maintenance of Austin, Inc. falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, ja establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #340 safest of 417 Building cleaning services, ja employers in Texas.

Maintenance of Austin, Inc. (31 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Maintenance of Austin, Inc.
Maintenance of Austin, Inc. (31 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Maintenance of Austin, Inc. has fewer employees than the Building cleaning services, janitorial median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 0.0 0 1 0
2023 11.1 11.1 3 0 0
2022 7.0 3.5 1 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 13.4 13.4 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 6.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · TX · Austin

4,064 Building cleaning services, janitorial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hospital Metropolitano de San German 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSSI / TYSON FOODS INC. - MONETT 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5860 - Manchester 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The DM Burr Group - Farmington Schools 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE TREES USA 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Treeland Nursery Inc 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE 145 Ranch LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cobalt Cattle Company LLC - Tulia 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR 3346 - Hollywood Galaxy 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CA004LWM 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 12483 Jefferson Parish 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Wright Enrichment 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mid-States Material Handling & Fabrication, Inc. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riverside Walter Reed Home Health Agency 5171 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alpine Adirondack Associates LLC, DBA Saranac Village at Will Rogers 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roy Rogers Ballenger 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.