Public Transportation · Washington

Maintenance Operations & Administration (MOA)

Richland, WA · ~288 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maintenance Operations & Administration (MOA) runs at 194% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Public Transportation workplace, earning a grade D.

Maintenance Operations & Administration (MOA): 8.7 TCR = 194% of Public Transportation BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maintenance Operations & Administration (MOA) safety composite

Maintenance Operations & Administration (MOA) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Maintenance Operations & Administration (MOA) held a steady TCR band

Maintenance Operations & Administration (MOA)'s TCR held near 0.3 from 8.5 in 2016 to 8.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.5 · 2017=9.4 · 2018=8.2 · 2019=9.3 · 2021=8.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485113 · Richland, WA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 8.7 · 194% of ind

  • DART 7.2 DART
  • RANK #5/6
  • PHOTO 7057 TRANSIT REGION-…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 109 inj
  • SIZE ~288 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 7057 TRANSIT REGION-NASHVILLE TRANSIT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Maintenance Operations & Administration (MOA) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maintenance Operations & Administration (MOA) averages 8.7 TCR (194% of the Public Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maintenance Operations & Administration (MOA) TCR series: 2016=8.5 · 2017=9.4 · 2018=8.2 · 2019=9.3 · 2021=8.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Maintenance Operations & Administration (MOA) falls in its industry

332 Public Transportation establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 6 Public Transportation employers in Washington.

Maintenance Operations & Administration (MOA) (288 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Maintenance Operations & Administration (MOA)
Maintenance Operations & Administration (MOA) (288 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Maintenance Operations & Administration (MOA) has more employees than the Public Transportation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 8.2 7.2 22 3 0
2019 9.3 6.8 26 0 0
2018 8.2 5.7 19 1 0
2017 9.4 7.4 23 0 0
2016 8.5 6.8 19 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485113 · WA · Richland

332 Public Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 83 employers in Richland, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 7057 TRANSIT REGION-NASHVILLE TRANSIT 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6091-630 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2662-7058 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 7071 TRANSIT REGION-FRESNO 8.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE SAS Mattawa West 288 FTE
STATE-SIZE TK Elevator Kirkland 288 FTE
STATE-SIZE First Student, Inc. - 12125-A 288 FTE
STATE-SIZE Global Specialty Fulfillment : UWA4 288 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000320 4,577 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA566 KADLEC REGIONAL MEDICAL CTR-RICHLAND HR 2,150 FTE
CITY-NEAR Waste Treatment Completion Company (WTCC) 1,978 FTE
CITY-NEAR Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) 673 FTE
NAT-TCR CSS Farms - Cody 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ms Aerospace, Inc. 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR State of California - 048 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Greenhaven Estates Assisted Living 8.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Buckhannon 288 FTE
NAT-SIZE K057-M001 288 FTE
NAT-SIZE DFW 288 FTE
NAT-SIZE Warm Hearth Village 288 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.