Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system · Mississippi

Maintenance Systems Inc.

Florence, MS · ~23 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maintenance Systems Inc. runs at 214% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system workplace, earning a grade F.

Maintenance Systems Inc.: 2.6 TCR = 214% of Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maintenance Systems Inc. safety composite

Maintenance Systems Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Maintenance Systems Inc.: 0.0 → 3.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 3.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Maintenance Systems Inc.'s TCR rose 3.8 from 0.0 in 2021 to 3.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Florence, MS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.6 · 214% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/8
  • PHOTO MWWD Wastewater Trea…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MWWD Wastewater Treatment Facility (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Maintenance Systems Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maintenance Systems Inc. averages 2.6 TCR (214% of the Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maintenance Systems Inc. TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=3.9 · 2024=3.8 · BLS 1.2

Where Maintenance Systems Inc. falls in its industry

400 Collection, treatment, and dis establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 8 Collection, treatment, and dis employers in Mississippi.

Maintenance Systems Inc. (23 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Maintenance Systems Inc.
Maintenance Systems Inc. (23 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Maintenance Systems Inc. has fewer employees than the Collection, treatment, and disposal of w median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2022 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · MS · Florence

400 Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 8 employers in Florence, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MWWD Wastewater Treatment Facility 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Camp Creek 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Water Quality Science Building 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR H2O innovation Operation & Maintenance LLC - Harrison County O&M 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Walnut Grove Hatchery (MLO) 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmer's Gin Inc. 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pursue Energy 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE General Office Substation 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hemphill Construction Co., Inc 266 FTE
CITY-NEAR Briar Hill Rest Home LLC 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR Suncoast Infrastructure Inc 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR F. L. CRANE & SONS FLORENCE 58 FTE
NAT-TCR Iby, LLC 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Arlington National Cemetery Tours Inc 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Reynolds Services 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ozark Steel Fabricators, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Oaks at Dalton 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE MTJ Electric 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Washington Courthouse Purina Feed Mill 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Commercial Freight Services, Inc. 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.