Footing and foundation concrete contractors · California

Malcolm Drilling Northern CA

Hayward, CA · ~222 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Malcolm Drilling Northern CA runs at 51% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Footing and foundation concrete contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Malcolm Drilling Northern CA: 1.4 TCR = 51% of Footing and foundation concrete contractors BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Malcolm Drilling Northern CA safety composite

Malcolm Drilling Northern CA scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Malcolm Drilling Northern CA: 0.4 → 1.9 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 2.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.44× in 2023

Malcolm Drilling Northern CA's TCR rose 1.6 from 0.4 in 2017 to 1.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · Hayward, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.4 · 51% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #18/166
  • PHOTO JT Wimsatt Contracti…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~222 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JT Wimsatt Contracting Co., Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Malcolm Drilling Northern CA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Malcolm Drilling Northern CA averages 1.4 TCR (51% of the Footing and foundation concrete contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Malcolm Drilling Northern CA TCR series: 2017=0.4 · 2018=2.5 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=1.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Malcolm Drilling Northern CA falls in its industry

1,314 Footing and foundation concret establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 166 Footing and foundation concret employers in California.

Malcolm Drilling Northern CA (222 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Malcolm Drilling Northern CA
Malcolm Drilling Northern CA (222 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Malcolm Drilling Northern CA has more employees than the Footing and foundation concrete contract median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.9 0.6 3 0 0
2022 1.5 1.5 3 0 0
2021 0.8 0.4 2 0 0
2018 2.5 2.5 7 0 0
2017 0.4 0.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · CA · Hayward

1,314 Footing and foundation concrete contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 336 employers in Hayward, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JT Wimsatt Contracting Co., Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR RCD Concrete Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Five Star Landscaping & Irrigation, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Concrete Preservation 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Colligere Farm Management 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE LINCOLN HEIGHTS SERVICE CENTER 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE JB Pacific, Inc. 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE W. L. Butler 222 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 518 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 100 2,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 117 2,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Rose Hospital 929 FTE
NAT-TCR RAFS of FWB, Inc 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Glendale, Az #00168 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Southern Atlantic : SVC-CharlotteNC-USA 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Transport Solutions Americas : MFG-Freemont, OH-USA 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Eversource - Brockton 222 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodman's Food Market Appleton 22 222 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allen Butler Construction Inc 222 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amcor Fremont Ohio 222 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.