Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · California

Mamba Logistics, Inc.

Glendale, CA · ~82 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.4
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mamba Logistics, Inc. runs at 238% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade F.

Mamba Logistics, Inc.: 15.4 TCR = 238% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mamba Logistics, Inc. safety composite

Mamba Logistics, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 17 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mamba Logistics, Inc.: 9.3 → 21.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 21.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.1× in 2024

Mamba Logistics, Inc.'s TCR rose 12.4 from 9.3 in 2022 to 21.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Glendale, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.4 · 238% of ind

  • DART 17.0 DART
  • RANK #538/710
  • PHOTO FedEx 2011 FACTORY L…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FedEx 2011 FACTORY LANE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Mamba Logistics, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mamba Logistics, Inc. averages 15.4 TCR (238% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mamba Logistics, Inc. TCR series: 2022=9.3 · 2023=15.4 · 2024=21.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Mamba Logistics, Inc. falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #538 safest of 710 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in California.

Mamba Logistics, Inc. (82 employees, TCR 15.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Mamba Logistics, Inc.
Mamba Logistics, Inc. (82 employees, TCR 15.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Mamba Logistics, Inc. has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 21.6 17.0 14 0 0
2023 15.4 6.2 10 0 0
2022 9.3 9.3 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · CA · Glendale

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 148 employers in Glendale, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FedEx 2011 FACTORY LANE 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR BLYTHEVILLE (ARBLY) 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 194060002 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Twin Cities Last Mile Logistics Inc. 15.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE West Coast Harvesting Inc. 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farm 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wight Vineyard Management, Inc. 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Growers Harvesting LLC 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 604 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 615 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9292-AHGL001 - HOSPITAL 2,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR VER Technologies, LLC 1,692 FTE
NAT-TCR The Arc Western Montana 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Mauer Construction Inc. 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 2950 Gabel Road 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Rota-Mill, Inc. 15.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Life Skills Training Center, Inc. 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE BION, inc. 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waters of Martinsville 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forest Hill Heights LLC 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.