Motor freight carrier, general, local · New Hampshire

Manchester motor freight.com

Manchester, NH · ~22 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Manchester motor freight.com runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Motor freight carrier, general, local workplace, earning a grade A.

Manchester motor freight.com: 0.8 TCR = 18% of Motor freight carrier, general, local BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Manchester motor freight.com safety composite

Manchester motor freight.com scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Manchester motor freight.com held a steady TCR band

Manchester motor freight.com's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484110 · Manchester, NH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/10
  • PHOTO Fraticelli Trucking …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fraticelli Trucking Company, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

Manchester motor freight.com in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Manchester motor freight.com averages 0.8 TCR (18% of the Motor freight carrier, general, local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Manchester motor freight.com TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Manchester motor freight.com falls in its industry

2,784 Motor freight carrier, general establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 10 Motor freight carrier, general employers in New Hampshire.

Manchester motor freight.com (22 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Manchester motor freight.com
Manchester motor freight.com (22 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Manchester motor freight.com has fewer employees than the Motor freight carrier, general, local median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.1 4.1 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484110 · NH · Manchester

2,784 Motor freight carrier, general, local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 253 employers in Manchester, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fraticelli Trucking Company, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR OHMHI - SCS-MIDDLEBURG HTS - 3823 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR JADC Enterprises, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gachman Trucking 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Newington Energy 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blanc & Bailey Construction, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Budel Construction Corporation 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Liberty Electric, Inc. 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Point32Health Manchester 4,440 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elliot Hospital 2,745 FTE
CITY-NEAR Catholic Medical Center 2,086 FTE
CITY-NEAR 15966 1,154 FTE
NAT-TCR 129004 - CFS Job Cost Des Moines 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sulzer Electro-Mechanical Services (US) Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at St Vincent Infirmary Med Food 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Independence Energy Facility 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Keizer Refrigeration 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quality Air Heating & Cooling, Inc. (Portage) 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE City Point Fire Protection, Inc. 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Western Foundries, Inc. 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.