Ambulance services, air or ground · Virginia

Manchester Volunteer Rescue Squad, Inc.

North Chesterfield, VA · ~52 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Manchester Volunteer Rescue Squad, Inc. runs at 288% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Ambulance services, air or ground workplace, earning a grade F.

Manchester Volunteer Rescue Squad, Inc.: 10.9 TCR = 288% of Ambulance services, air or ground BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Manchester Volunteer Rescue Squad, Inc. safety composite

Manchester Volunteer Rescue Squad, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 10.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Manchester Volunteer Rescue Squad, Inc.: 7.9 → 12.3 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 12.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.13× in 2019

Manchester Volunteer Rescue Squad, Inc.'s TCR rose 4.4 from 7.9 in 2016 to 12.3 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 12.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 1.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621910 · North Chesterfield, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.9 · 288% of ind

  • DART 12.3 DART
  • RANK #9/20
  • PHOTO Detroit Lakes EMS
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Detroit Lakes EMS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Manchester Volunteer Rescue Squad, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Manchester Volunteer Rescue Squad, Inc. averages 10.9 TCR (288% of the Ambulance services, air or ground BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Manchester Volunteer Rescue Squad, Inc. TCR series: 2016=7.9 · 2017=10.6 · 2018=12.9 · 2019=12.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Manchester Volunteer Rescue Squad, Inc. falls in its industry

976 Ambulance services, air or gro establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 20 Ambulance services, air or gro employers in Virginia.

Manchester Volunteer Rescue Squad, Inc. (52 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 8.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Manchester Volunteer Rescue Squad, Inc.
Manchester Volunteer Rescue Squad, Inc. (52 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 8.3

Manchester Volunteer Rescue Squad, Inc. has fewer employees than the Ambulance services, air or ground median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 12.3 12.3 1 0 0
2018 12.9 12.9 1 0 0
2017 10.6 0.0 1 0 0
2016 7.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621910 · VA · North Chesterfield

976 Ambulance services, air or ground employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 47 employers in North Chesterfield, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Detroit Lakes EMS 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR HEMS 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR GFL 033 Gallup NM Operations 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Britain EMS 11.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Virginia Warehouse 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE CHARLOTTESVILLE-GAS 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Environmental Systems Service, Ltd. (Culpeper, VA) 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE 300-DREES-WASHINGTON DC 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR INTERSPAN INC 662 FTE
CITY-NEAR Abilene Motor Express LLC 504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cranemasters, Inc. 247 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate 238 FTE
NAT-TCR Shopko Store #70 (Spokane Valley, WA (East)) 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Disposal - Stateline Hauling 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Honouliuli Wastewater Treatment Plant 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Enterprise Alamo National 45F8 45F9 10.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Best Western Plus Windjammer Inn 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boggs & Poole Contracting Group, Inc 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elgin Cross Dock 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hunting Energy Services, LLC Trenchless Division 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.