Hotels (except casino hotels) · District of Columbia

Mandarin Oriental, Washington DC

Washington, DC · ~290 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mandarin Oriental, Washington DC runs at 251% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hotels (except casino hotels) workplace, earning a grade F.

Mandarin Oriental, Washington DC: 7.5 TCR = 251% of Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS 3.0 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mandarin Oriental, Washington DC safety composite

Mandarin Oriental, Washington DC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Mandarin Oriental, Washington DC held a steady TCR band

Mandarin Oriental, Washington DC's TCR held near 0.2 from 7.8 in 2016 to 7.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.8 · 2020=7.2 · 2021=7.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Washington, DC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.5 · 251% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #62/71
  • PHOTO Hyatt Regency Savannah
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~290 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hyatt Regency Savannah (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · District of Columbia employers → · Look up another →

Mandarin Oriental, Washington DC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mandarin Oriental, Washington DC averages 7.5 TCR (251% of the Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mandarin Oriental, Washington DC TCR series: 2016=7.8 · 2020=7.2 · 2021=7.6 · BLS 3.0

Where Mandarin Oriental, Washington DC falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to District of Columbia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #62 safest of 71 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers in District of Columbia.

Mandarin Oriental, Washington DC (290 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mandarin Oriental, Washington DC
Mandarin Oriental, Washington DC (290 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Mandarin Oriental, Washington DC has more employees than the Hotels (except casino hotels) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 7.6 4.8 11 0 0
2020 7.2 4.5 8 0 0
2016 7.8 5.0 22 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · DC · Washington

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 793 rated employers in District of Columbia with headcount on file · 748 employers in Washington, DC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hyatt Regency Savannah 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fitger's on the Lake, LLC 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fairmont Grand Del Mar 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vintage Hotels, Inc. 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc 289 FTE
STATE-SIZE Western Bus Facility 292 FTE
STATE-SIZE SODEXO AT HOWARD UNIVERSITY BLACKBURN 294 FTE
STATE-SIZE 620630700 - CAPITAL ONE ARENA - CONCESSIONS 286 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's National Medical Center 7,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Washington Hospital Center 7,073 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Georgetown University Hospital 4,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR Customs and Border Protection - Headquarters 3,601 FTE
NAT-TCR PC West 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Memorial Medical Center (200-MMC) 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Builders all locations 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Dayton Walls and Ceilings, Inc. 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE UT_Layton 290 FTE
NAT-SIZE TRU Hackleburg 290 FTE
NAT-SIZE GR Bristol Care Primary Group, PC 290 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boxes, Inc. - Bridgeton 290 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.