Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · California

Manning Gardens Care Center

Fresno, CA · ~94 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Manning Gardens Care Center runs at 140% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade D.

Manning Gardens Care Center: 9.1 TCR = 140% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Manning Gardens Care Center safety composite

Manning Gardens Care Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Manning Gardens Care Center: 8.5 → 9.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 9.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.61× in 2024

Manning Gardens Care Center's TCR rose 1.1 from 8.5 in 2023 to 9.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Fresno, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 9.1 · 140% of ind

  • DART 5.5 DART
  • RANK #444/739
  • PHOTO Lakewood Nursing and…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~94 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lakewood Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Manning Gardens Care Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Manning Gardens Care Center averages 9.1 TCR (140% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Manning Gardens Care Center TCR series: 2023=8.5 · 2024=9.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Manning Gardens Care Center falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #444 safest of 739 Convalescent homes or convales employers in California.

Manning Gardens Care Center (94 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Manning Gardens Care Center
Manning Gardens Care Center (94 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Manning Gardens Care Center has fewer employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.6 5.5 7 0 0
2023 8.5 2.8 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CA · Fresno

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 981 employers in Fresno, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lakewood Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bridgeview Estates Century 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Lodge At Stillwater 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Garfield Memorial Hospital Nursing Care Facility 9.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE MORALES FARM LABOR SERVICE 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fondomonte CA - Blythe Farm 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Robinson Enterprises, Inc 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Javier Martinez Contracting 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Fresno 7,553 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ag Force LLC 6,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Ctr 5,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Center 4,921 FTE
NAT-TCR Wesley Enhanced Living at Stapeley 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ohspf - Springfield Center 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Gary Poppins 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Kiffmeyer Inc. 9.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Carolina Container Thomasville 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zack Painting Co., Inc. 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peterbilt of Sioux City 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lincoln Court 94 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.