Skilled nursing facilities · Pennsylvania

Manor Care Health Services - Northside

Pittsburgh, PA · ~79 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.5
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Manor Care Health Services - Northside runs at 130% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Manor Care Health Services - Northside: 8.5 TCR = 130% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Manor Care Health Services - Northside safety composite

Manor Care Health Services - Northside scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2016→2018

Manor Care Health Services - Northside injury rate improved

Manor Care Health Services - Northside's TCR fell 4.6 from 11.2 in 2016 to 6.5 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 11.2 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.2 · 2017=7.7 · 2018=6.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Pittsburgh, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.5 · 130% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #453/754
  • PHOTO Cheney Care Center
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cheney Care Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Manor Care Health Services - Northside in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Manor Care Health Services - Northside averages 8.5 TCR (130% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Manor Care Health Services - Northside TCR series: 2016=11.2 · 2017=7.7 · 2018=6.5 · BLS 6.5

Where Manor Care Health Services - Northside falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #453 safest of 754 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Pennsylvania.

Manor Care Health Services - Northside (79 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Manor Care Health Services - Northside
Manor Care Health Services - Northside (79 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Manor Care Health Services - Northside has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 6.5 0.0 4 0 0
2017 7.7 1.5 5 0 0
2016 11.2 4.8 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · PA · Pittsburgh

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cheney Care Center 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR WHITE OAK ESTATES 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Civic Center Health and Rehabilitation, LLC 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yardley Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE John C. Leo & Son, LLC 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE C.J. Mushroom Co., LLC 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ernst Conservation Seeds Inc 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Specialty Egg 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR SLC Presidential Place 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 4795-PD-MHT-MANCHESTER-PD 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Gold Cross-Eau Claire 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Timesavers LLC 8.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Valley View Nursing Home 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northern California - 602 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Idlefonso / Los Alamos National Laboratory 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodmark ,LLC 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.