Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Georgia

Manor House of Columbus

Columbus, GA · ~44 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Manor House of Columbus runs at 129% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Manor House of Columbus: 4.9 TCR = 129% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Manor House of Columbus safety composite

Manor House of Columbus scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2016→2017

Manor House of Columbus injury rate improved

Manor House of Columbus's TCR fell 1.9 from 5.9 in 2016 to 3.9 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.9 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.9 · 2017=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Columbus, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 129% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #63/205
  • PHOTO Brookdale Jackson Oaks
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Jackson Oaks (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Manor House of Columbus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Manor House of Columbus averages 4.9 TCR (129% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Manor House of Columbus TCR series: 2016=5.9 · 2017=3.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Manor House of Columbus falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #63 safest of 205 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Georgia.

Manor House of Columbus (44 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Manor House of Columbus
Manor House of Columbus (44 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Manor House of Columbus has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2016 5.9 5.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · GA · Columbus

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 291 employers in Columbus, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Jackson Oaks 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SCAL Hobart, LLC 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Courtyard at Oshkosh 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 63005 SUNRISE OF FIVE FORKS 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 04564100-00W002 LOCAL BOUNTI CORPORATION-LOCAL BOUNTI CORPORATION 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Duluth Operating - 3825 Rogers Bridge Rd. 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Albany Operating/TMC - 101 Georgia Power Rd. Albany, GA 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gainesboro Operating 2293 Skelton Rd Gainesville 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST FRANCIS HEALTH LLC 2,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR Piedmont Columbus Midtown Hospital 1,890 FTE
CITY-NEAR P&W Columbus, Georgia Site (Main Campus) 1,838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Paul S Amos Campus 1,748 FTE
NAT-TCR Allied Waste, LLC - West Columbia, Sc 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 0425 - Torrance, Ca 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR NAPP Columbia 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR InfuScience, Inc. - Chantilly, VA 2410 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Santa Anita 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Chillicothe Inc 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ashland Nursing and Rehab LLC 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Insys Manufacturing, LLC 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.