Apparel findings and trimmings cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) · California

Manteca Ops Center

Manteca, CA · ~1,489 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Manteca Ops Center runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Apparel findings and trimmings cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) workplace, earning a grade C.

Manteca Ops Center: 3.7 TCR = 113% of Apparel findings and trimmings cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Manteca Ops Center safety composite

Manteca Ops Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7094.2

2021→2024

Manteca Ops Center injury rate improved

Manteca Ops Center's TCR fell 7094.2 from 7098.1 in 2021 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7098.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=7098.1 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 315990 · Manteca, CA ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 113% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #5/7
  • PHOTO AIORIA - Orange City…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 103 inj
  • SIZE ~1,489 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AIORIA - Orange City, IA SPP (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Manteca Ops Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Manteca Ops Center averages 3.7 TCR (113% of the Apparel findings and trimmings cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Manteca Ops Center TCR series: 2021=7098.1 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=4 · BLS 3.3

Where Manteca Ops Center falls in its industry

62 Apparel findings and trimmings establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 7 Apparel findings and trimmings employers in California.

Manteca Ops Center (1,489 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 111 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Manteca Ops Center
Manteca Ops Center (1,489 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 111 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Manteca Ops Center has more employees than the Apparel findings and trimmings cut and s median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 2.4 37 5 0
2023 3.5 2.7 37 0 0
2021 7098.1 3131.5 29 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

315990 · CA · Manteca

62 Apparel findings and trimmings cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 118 employers in Manteca, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AIORIA - Orange City, IA SPP 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oak Hall Cap and Gown - Chilhowie 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant 1 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Badger Sportswear 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sunview Vineyards of California Inc 1,489 FTE
STATE-SIZE Channel Islands Social Services 1,488 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aaron Ruiz 1,491 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fresh Harvest INC 1,487 FTE
CITY-NEAR ClearPath Workforce Managment 971 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-208 911 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-226 910 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DCK1 640 FTE
NAT-TCR Bruckner Shelter 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR The Christ Hospital 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR PA161 Mt Jewett MDF 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR SRG Global, INC 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Chicago - Chicago Department of Aviation - O'Hare International Airport 1,489 FTE
NAT-SIZE Olin Winchester, LLC 1,489 FTE
NAT-SIZE Snowmass Ski Area 1,488 FTE
NAT-SIZE Miron Construction Co., Inc. 1,490 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.