Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing · California

Manufacturing Plant

Petaluma, CA · ~91 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Manufacturing Plant runs at 292% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Manufacturing Plant: 9.6 TCR = 292% of Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Manufacturing Plant safety composite

Manufacturing Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.7

2017→2024

Manufacturing Plant injury rate improved

Manufacturing Plant's TCR fell 12.7 from 15.0 in 2017 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 20.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=15.0 · 2018=20.1 · 2019=8.8 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=11.6 · 2023=10.8 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311511 · Petaluma, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.6 · 292% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #35/38
  • PHOTO Prairie Farms Dairy …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 67 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Prairie Farms Dairy - Holland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Manufacturing Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Manufacturing Plant averages 9.6 TCR (292% of the Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Manufacturing Plant TCR series: 2017=15 · 2018=20.1 · 2019=8.8 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=11.6 · 2023=10.8 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Manufacturing Plant falls in its industry

457 Milk processing (e.g., bottlin establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 38 Milk processing (e.g., bottlin employers in California.

Manufacturing Plant (91 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 140 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Manufacturing Plant
Manufacturing Plant (91 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 140 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Manufacturing Plant has fewer employees than the Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 2.3 1 1 0
2023 10.8 9.6 8 1 0
2022 11.6 7.7 9 0 0
2021 3.3 3.3 3 0 0
2020 5.2 3.9 4 0 0
2019 8.8 7.7 8 0 0
2018 20.1 18.9 16 0 0
2017 15.0 15.0 18 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311511 · CA · Petaluma

457 Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 153 employers in Petaluma, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Prairie Farms Dairy - Holland 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harrisburg Dairies, Inc. 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dale Rd 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ultra Dairy LLC 9.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE CDK Agriculture, Inc. 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Belridge 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Micro Paradox 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE CFS, LP. 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 136 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 470 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 169 2,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR Solairus Aviation 1,400 FTE
NAT-TCR MW Morrissey Construction, LLC 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR At Home Stores #120 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR AZP037 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Johnson City 9.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Killebrew, Inc. 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fire Department 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amarillo Foreward Warehouse 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Western Kansas Division 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.