Industrial molds (except steel ingot) manufacturing · South Carolina

Manufacturing Specialties, Inc

Greenville, SC · ~26 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Manufacturing Specialties, Inc runs at 232% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Industrial molds (except steel ingot) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Manufacturing Specialties, Inc: 7.7 TCR = 232% of Industrial molds (except steel ingot) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Manufacturing Specialties, Inc safety composite

Manufacturing Specialties, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2022→2023

Manufacturing Specialties, Inc injury rate improved

Manufacturing Specialties, Inc's TCR fell 0.6 from 8.0 in 2022 to 7.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=8.0 · 2023=7.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333511 · Greenville, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.7 · 232% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO Jarvis Company, Inc
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jarvis Company, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Manufacturing Specialties, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Manufacturing Specialties, Inc averages 7.7 TCR (232% of the Industrial molds (except steel ingot) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Manufacturing Specialties, Inc TCR series: 2022=8 · 2023=7.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Manufacturing Specialties, Inc falls in its industry

216 Industrial molds (except steel establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Industrial molds (except steel employers in South Carolina.

Manufacturing Specialties, Inc (26 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Manufacturing Specialties, Inc
Manufacturing Specialties, Inc (26 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Manufacturing Specialties, Inc has fewer employees than the Industrial molds (except steel ingot) ma median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 7.3 3.7 2 0 0
2022 8.0 4.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333511 · SC · Greenville

216 Industrial molds (except steel ingot) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jarvis Company, Inc 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Winona Pattern & Mold 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Renaissance Manufacturing Grop Anniston, LLC 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mac-Mold Base, Inc. 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Walther Farms SC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE COLUMBIA ENERGY CENTER 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Simpsonville Operations Center 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Savage Rd. Crew Quarters 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR Summerwinds Campbell 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR First Class Vending 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Nashoba Valley Medical Center 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lanco Trucking, Inc. 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE John Prosock Machine Inc 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chippewa Falls 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Melbourne- Distribution 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE EXTECH/Exterior Technologies, Inc. 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.