Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Illinois

Maple Glen Memory Care

Glen Ellyn, IL · ~56 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maple Glen Memory Care runs at 157% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Maple Glen Memory Care: 6.0 TCR = 157% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maple Glen Memory Care safety composite

Maple Glen Memory Care scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.8

2020→2024

Maple Glen Memory Care injury rate improved

Maple Glen Memory Care's TCR fell 12.8 from 15.3 in 2020 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 15.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=15.3 · 2021=12.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Glen Ellyn, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 157% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #97/265
  • PHOTO Artis Senior Living …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Artis Senior Living of Mason (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Maple Glen Memory Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maple Glen Memory Care averages 6.0 TCR (157% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maple Glen Memory Care TCR series: 2020=15.3 · 2021=12 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Maple Glen Memory Care falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #97 safest of 265 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Illinois.

Maple Glen Memory Care (56 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Maple Glen Memory Care
Maple Glen Memory Care (56 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Maple Glen Memory Care has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 2.5 0 1 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 12.0 8.0 3 0 0
2020 15.3 15.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · IL · Glen Ellyn

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 44 employers in Glen Ellyn, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Artis Senior Living of Mason 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR St John Lutheran Home 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Indian River Estates 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR South Lewis SH OPCO, LLC 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bulk Power Operations 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Norris Electric Cooperative 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE 73G - Northern S - IL Gas Ops 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schaumburg Reporting Center 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR College of DuPage 2,427 FTE
CITY-NEAR COLLEGE OF DUPAGE #502 2,368 FTE
CITY-NEAR Glenbard Twp High School District 87 1,408 FTE
CITY-NEAR GLENBARD DIST 87 1,141 FTE
NAT-TCR Normandy Inn Inc. 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Jefferson Hospital Stratford 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Great Southern Wood - Mansura 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1916 - North Haven 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Drake's: The Barn 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Munzing - Clover 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cogen Technologies Linden Venture LP 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Creative Foam - Bremen 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.