General warehousing and storage · Pennsylvania

Maple Press Distribution Center YDC

York, PA · ~37 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maple Press Distribution Center YDC runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade C.

Maple Press Distribution Center YDC: 4.8 TCR = 83% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maple Press Distribution Center YDC safety composite

Maple Press Distribution Center YDC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2016→2019

Maple Press Distribution Center YDC injury rate improved

Maple Press Distribution Center YDC's TCR fell 2.2 from 8.0 in 2016 to 5.8 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.0 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.0 · 2017=5.6 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=5.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · York, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.8 · 83% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #396/650
  • PHOTO Book Fairs - Chicago
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Book Fairs - Chicago (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Maple Press Distribution Center YDC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maple Press Distribution Center YDC averages 4.8 TCR (83% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maple Press Distribution Center YDC TCR series: 2016=8 · 2017=5.6 · 2018=0 · 2019=5.8 · BLS 5.8

Where Maple Press Distribution Center YDC falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #396 safest of 650 General warehousing and storag employers in Pennsylvania.

Maple Press Distribution Center YDC (37 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Maple Press Distribution Center YDC
Maple Press Distribution Center YDC (37 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Maple Press Distribution Center YDC has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 5.8 2.9 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 5.6 5.6 2 0 0
2016 8.0 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · PA · York

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 496 employers in York, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Book Fairs - Chicago 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 30416 CAPSTONE - DOLLAR GENERAL JACKSON GA 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dothan warehouse Freezer 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kann Enterprises Inc Cooper CA 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Packing 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Packing House 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Adams Electric Cooperative Inc. Headquarters Office 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Claverack REC - Wysox 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellSpan York Hospital 4,886 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellSpan Medical Group 4,293 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wellspan Health 2,591 FTE
CITY-NEAR FedEx Supply Chain (Target York) 1,875 FTE
NAT-TCR Eti LLC 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR PHC-Morgan City LP 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Omni New Haven Hotel at Yale 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Tracker Marine-Clinton 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chavez Roofing Corporation 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mililani, HI Office CS 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Triangle Services - Tampa (TPA) Aviation Svcs 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Homeland 880 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.