Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Washington

Maplewood Gardens Assisted Living

Spokane, WA · ~61 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
20.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maplewood Gardens Assisted Living runs at 535% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Maplewood Gardens Assisted Living: 20.3 TCR = 535% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maplewood Gardens Assisted Living safety composite

Maplewood Gardens Assisted Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 20.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 18.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Maplewood Gardens Assisted Living: 55.6 → 60.3 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 101.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.17× in 2024

Maplewood Gardens Assisted Living's TCR rose 4.7 from 55.6 in 2020 to 60.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 101.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Spokane, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 20.3 · 535% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #102/109
  • PHOTO GEER VILLAGE
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GEER VILLAGE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Maplewood Gardens Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maplewood Gardens Assisted Living averages 20.3 TCR (535% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maplewood Gardens Assisted Living TCR series: 2020=55.6 · 2021=20.3 · 2022=101.9 · 2023=76.2 · 2024=60.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Maplewood Gardens Assisted Living falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #102 safest of 109 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Washington.

Maplewood Gardens Assisted Living (61 employees, TCR 20.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Maplewood Gardens Assisted Living
Maplewood Gardens Assisted Living (61 employees, TCR 20.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Maplewood Gardens Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 60.3 3.5 2 32 0
2023 76.2 70.5 6 34 0
2022 101.9 98.0 3 50 0
2021 20.3 18.3 1 9 0
2020 55.6 55.6 1 23 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · WA · Spokane

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 551 employers in Spokane, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GEER VILLAGE 20.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hearthside Senior Living of Bartlett 20.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR TSMM Management LLC dtd Primrose Basic Care and Memory Cottages 20.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Atrium at Navesink Harbor 20.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE CSS Farms - Pasco 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE AK Victory 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Adair Homes Corporate 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wolf Industries Inc 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000345 6,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA642 SACRED HEART MEDICAL CENTER-SPOKANE HR 5,062 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - GEG1 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Spokane 2,451 FTE
NAT-TCR WI029SRM 20.3 TCR
NAT-TCR La Crosse Vending 20.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0007 W. Los Angeles 20.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Keystone Foundry Division of United Brass Works 20.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Allied Construction Management 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE iDrive Fulfillment, LLC 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercy Hospital Waldron 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Park Maint Area 2 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.