Electric power distribution systems · Iowa

Maquoketa Valley Electric Cooperative

Anamosa, IA · ~71 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maquoketa Valley Electric Cooperative runs at 239% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power distribution systems workplace, earning a grade F.

Maquoketa Valley Electric Cooperative: 2.9 TCR = 239% of Electric power distribution systems BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maquoketa Valley Electric Cooperative safety composite

Maquoketa Valley Electric Cooperative scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2016→2022

Maquoketa Valley Electric Cooperative injury rate improved

Maquoketa Valley Electric Cooperative's TCR fell 4.7 from 5.9 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.9 · 2017=2.7 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Anamosa, IA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.9 · 239% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #36/64
  • PHOTO MALDEN-MA63
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MALDEN-MA63 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

Maquoketa Valley Electric Cooperative in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maquoketa Valley Electric Cooperative averages 2.9 TCR (239% of the Electric power distribution systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maquoketa Valley Electric Cooperative TCR series: 2016=5.9 · 2017=2.7 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=1.3 · BLS 1.2

Where Maquoketa Valley Electric Cooperative falls in its industry

2,958 Electric power distribution sy establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 64 Electric power distribution sy employers in Iowa.

Maquoketa Valley Electric Cooperative (71 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Maquoketa Valley Electric Cooperative
Maquoketa Valley Electric Cooperative (71 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Maquoketa Valley Electric Cooperative has more employees than the Electric power distribution systems median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2021 3.8 1.3 3 0 0
2020 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 3.8 1.3 3 0 0
2018 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2017 2.7 0.0 0 2 0
2016 5.9 1.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · IA · Anamosa

2,958 Electric power distribution systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 20 employers in Anamosa, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MALDEN-MA63 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cleveland Service Center 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR RS G-OPERATORS TRAINING CENTER 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kodiak Service Center 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Peters Construction Corporation 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE T & K Roofing & Sheet Metal Company Inc. 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Interstate Mechanical Corp 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE J Pettiecord Inc 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR ASP Offenders 692 FTE
CITY-NEAR ASP Staff 297 FTE
CITY-NEAR IPI Offenders 202 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 646 167 FTE
NAT-TCR GAT-ODFL 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR CD Investors, LLC/Production Facility 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Tops #271 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 473 - Valparaiso 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE OGU-ODFL 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lunds & Byerlys, Downtown Mpls 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pallette Stone Corp 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE True World Foods Los Angeles LLC 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.