Ammonia, anhydrous and aqueous, manufacturing · California

Mar Vista Resources

Corcoran, CA · ~24 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mar Vista Resources runs at 261% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Ammonia, anhydrous and aqueous, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Mar Vista Resources: 8.6 TCR = 261% of Ammonia, anhydrous and aqueous, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mar Vista Resources safety composite

Mar Vista Resources scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.8

2017→2024

Mar Vista Resources injury rate improved

Mar Vista Resources's TCR fell 5.8 from 13.7 in 2017 to 7.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 17.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.91× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=13.7 · 2018=8.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=17.5 · 2022=17.5 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=7.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325311 · Corcoran, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.6 · 261% of ind

  • DART 7.9 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Mitchell County Farm…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mitchell County Farm Service Inc (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Mar Vista Resources in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mar Vista Resources averages 8.6 TCR (261% of the Ammonia, anhydrous and aqueous, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mar Vista Resources TCR series: 2017=13.7 · 2018=8.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=17.5 · 2022=17.5 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=7.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Mar Vista Resources falls in its industry

85 Ammonia, anhydrous and aqueous establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Ammonia, anhydrous and aqueous employers in California.

Mar Vista Resources (24 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Mar Vista Resources
Mar Vista Resources (24 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Mar Vista Resources has fewer employees than the Ammonia, anhydrous and aqueous, manufact median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.9 7.9 2 0 0
2023 4.2 4.2 1 0 0
2022 17.5 17.5 2 2 0
2021 17.5 13.1 4 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 8.1 4.0 2 0 0
2017 13.7 9.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325311 · CA · Corcoran

85 Ammonia, anhydrous and aqueous, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 21 employers in Corcoran, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mitchell County Farm Service Inc 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anuvia Plant Nutrients 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bio-Gro, Inc. 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ultra Yield Micronutrients 8.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Agro-Jal Farming Enterprises 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE MTD Farms 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marc Pura Ranch, LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Costa Farms 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State Prison at Corcoran 2,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR California State Prison Corcoran 1,922 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hansen Custom Farming, LLC 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR Recreation Association of Corcoran 72 FTE
NAT-TCR The Galesburg Sanitary District 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR S03373 - Commercial Disposal 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Klamm Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Non-Ferrous Extrusions 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE HDT Global Mansfield 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Culligan - Anoka 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE E.S.I. 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lahey Hamilton 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.