Vocational rehabilitation agencies · Connecticut

MARC Inc of Manchester

Manchester, CT · ~251 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MARC Inc of Manchester runs at 165% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Vocational rehabilitation agencies workplace, earning a grade D.

MARC Inc of Manchester: 6.3 TCR = 165% of Vocational rehabilitation agencies BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MARC Inc of Manchester safety composite

MARC Inc of Manchester scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2016→2023

MARC Inc of Manchester injury rate improved

MARC Inc of Manchester's TCR fell 3.9 from 9.8 in 2016 to 5.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.8 · 2017=7.3 · 2019=8.1 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=4.0 · 2023=5.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Manchester, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 165% of ind

  • DART 4.4 DART
  • RANK #14/38
  • PHOTO PARC Circle CIC (8200)
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 78 inj
  • SIZE ~251 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PARC Circle CIC (8200) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

MARC Inc of Manchester in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MARC Inc of Manchester averages 6.3 TCR (165% of the Vocational rehabilitation agencies BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MARC Inc of Manchester TCR series: 2016=9.8 · 2017=7.3 · 2019=8.1 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=4 · 2023=5.9 · BLS 3.8

Where MARC Inc of Manchester falls in its industry

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation agen establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 38 Vocational rehabilitation agen employers in Connecticut.

MARC Inc of Manchester (251 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate MARC Inc of Manchester
MARC Inc of Manchester (251 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

MARC Inc of Manchester has more employees than the Vocational rehabilitation agencies median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.9 4.4 8 0 0
2022 4.0 3.0 8 0 0
2021 5.3 3.7 10 0 0
2020 3.3 1.4 7 0 0
2019 8.1 6.2 17 0 0
2017 7.3 3.9 11 2 0
2016 9.8 7.5 17 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · CT · Manchester

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation agencies employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 145 employers in Manchester, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PARC Circle CIC (8200) 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Work Skills Corporation Ann Arbor 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hanover Store 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Traumatic Brain Injury Metro Services and Hennepin Semi-Independent Living Services 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE AHM TRAINING CTR, WAREHOUSE, ZONE OFFICE 251 FTE
STATE-SIZE Land N' Sea - Kellogg 251 FTE
STATE-SIZE CT - Sikorsky 251 FTE
STATE-SIZE Powder Ridge Mountain Park & Resort 251 FTE
CITY-NEAR Manchester Memorial Hospital 1,652 FTE
CITY-NEAR 235 MANCHESTER CT 412 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1891 387 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Office 381 FTE
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #1390 Waldorf, MD 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR TJN Enterprises, Inc 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR North America : Milliken Sidman 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Precision Operations LLC 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE MSG Holdings 251 FTE
NAT-SIZE Verland CLA 251 FTE
NAT-SIZE 540 White Plains Rd, Ste 300 251 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dart Container Sales Company 251 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.