Blinds (e.g., mini, venetian, vertical), all materials, manufacturing · California

Mariak Window Fashions

Name: Mariak Window Fashions Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Compton, CA · ~69 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 2.4
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mariak Window Fashions runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Blinds (e.g., mini, venetian, vertical), all materials, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Mariak Window Fashions: 2.4 TCR = 72% of Blinds (e.g., mini, venetian, vertical), all materials, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mariak Window Fashions safety composite

Mariak Window Fashions scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 2.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2021→2023

Mariak Window Fashions injury rate improved

Mariak Window Fashions's TCR fell 4.8 from 4.8 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=4.8 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 337920 · Compton, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 72% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #2/4
PHOTO Hunter Douglas
BOOK 2y book
INJ 5 inj
SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hunter Douglas (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Oceanair Vermo

2.5
CBG McKinney

2.5
This site

2.4
Hunter Douglas

2.4
Timber Blinds

2.4

What this shows Mariak Window Fashions averages 2.4 TCR (72% of the Blinds (e.g., mini, venetian, vertical), all materials, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Mariak Window Fashions TCR series: 2021=4.8 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Mariak Window Fashions falls in its industry

59 Blinds (e.g., mini, venetian, establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Blinds (e.g., mini, venetian, employers in California.

Mariak Window Fashions (69 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Mariak Window Fashions has fewer employees than the Blinds (e.g., mini, venetian, vertical), median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2023	0.0	0.0	0	0	0
2021	4.8	4.8	5	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

337920 · CA · Compton

59 Blinds (e.g., mini, venetian, vertical), all materials, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 143 employers in Compton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Hunter Douglas	BROOMFIELD, CO	2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Timber Blinds LLC	MCKINNEY, TX	2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Oceanair Vermont	MANCHESTER CENTER, VT	2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	CBG McKinney	MCKINNEY, TX	2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Woolf Enterprises	HURON	69 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Terranova Ranch, Inc	HELM	69 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Rayo Shop	VISALIA	69 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Sun Pacific Harvesting \| Citrus Harvesting	EXETER	69 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Ono-017	Compton	910 FTE
CITY-NEAR	430-DC006	Compton	793 FTE
CITY-NEAR	430-DC001	Compton	789 FTE
CITY-NEAR	The People Concern - SOLAR	Compton	448 FTE
NAT-TCR	PAXXUS	Addison, IL	2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	MycoTechnology	Aurora, CO	2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	SVC-Rollup Site	Benbrook, TX	2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	Parker Steel Company	Maumee, OH	2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Primary Elem	Chisago City, MN	69 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Cardinal Systems, Inc. - Fox Pools Plant - York	York, PA	69 FTE
NAT-SIZE	alveys	Evansville, IN	69 FTE
NAT-SIZE	ODC Network	Holland, MI	69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.