Assessor's offices, tax · Arizona

Maricopa County - Assessor (120)

Phoenix, AZ · ~262 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maricopa County - Assessor (120) runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assessor's offices, tax workplace, earning a grade A.

Maricopa County - Assessor (120): 0.7 TCR = 21% of Assessor's offices, tax BLS 3.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maricopa County - Assessor (120) safety composite

Maricopa County - Assessor (120) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2019→2024

Maricopa County - Assessor (120) injury rate improved

Maricopa County - Assessor (120)'s TCR fell 1.9 from 1.9 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.9 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921130 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/17
  • PHOTO GMI2 - GRANTS MANAGE…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~262 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GMI2 - GRANTS MANAGEMENT & INNOVATION (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Maricopa County - Assessor (120) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maricopa County - Assessor (120) averages 0.7 TCR (21% of the Assessor's offices, tax BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maricopa County - Assessor (120) TCR series: 2019=1.9 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Maricopa County - Assessor (120) falls in its industry

104 Assessor's offices, tax establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 17 Assessor's offices, tax employers in Arizona.

Maricopa County - Assessor (120) (262 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 1.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Maricopa County - Assessor (120)
Maricopa County - Assessor (120) (262 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 1.0

Maricopa County - Assessor (120) has more employees than the Assessor's offices, tax median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.3 0.9 3 0 0
2020 0.9 0.4 2 0 0
2019 1.9 1.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921130 · AZ · Phoenix

104 Assessor's offices, tax employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GMI2 - GRANTS MANAGEMENT & INNOVATION 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Assessor 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maricopa County - Real Estate (780) 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Business Service Department 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 660-00667 262 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 5303 262 FTE
STATE-SIZE 660-00672 262 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0466 - PRESCOTT AZ WHSE 262 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR LA Depot 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Altoona Lodging, LLC 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ohmstede Sulphur 1267 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Old Hickory Buildings, LLC 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE James J. Anderson Construction Co., Inc & Riverside Materials, Inc. 262 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hobby TX FXFE-HOB 262 FTE
NAT-SIZE Person Memorial Hospital 262 FTE
NAT-SIZE EaglePicher Technologies - C Street 262 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.