Administrative courts · Arizona

Maricopa County - Justice Courts (240)

Phoenix, AZ · ~356 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maricopa County - Justice Courts (240) runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Administrative courts workplace, earning a grade A.

Maricopa County - Justice Courts (240): 0.9 TCR = 29% of Administrative courts BLS 3.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maricopa County - Justice Courts (240) safety composite

Maricopa County - Justice Courts (240) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Maricopa County - Justice Courts (240): 0.0 → 0.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 1.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.43× in 2024

Maricopa County - Justice Courts (240)'s TCR rose 0.4 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922110 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 29% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #10/24
  • PHOTO Maricopa County - Cl…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~356 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Maricopa County - Clerk of the Superior Court (160) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Maricopa County - Justice Courts (240) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maricopa County - Justice Courts (240) averages 0.9 TCR (29% of the Administrative courts BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maricopa County - Justice Courts (240) TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=0.4 · BLS 3.2

Where Maricopa County - Justice Courts (240) falls in its industry

208 Administrative courts establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 24 Administrative courts employers in Arizona.

Maricopa County - Justice Courts (240) (356 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Maricopa County - Justice Courts (240)
Maricopa County - Justice Courts (240) (356 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Maricopa County - Justice Courts (240) has more employees than the Administrative courts median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2023 1.3 0.8 3 0 0
2022 1.4 0.5 3 0 0
2021 1.7 1.7 4 0 0
2020 0.8 0.8 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922110 · AZ · Phoenix

208 Administrative courts employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Maricopa County - Clerk of the Superior Court (160) 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Justice Courts 1-6 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alaska Court System (21) 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Franklin County Court of Justice 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE MBM-8 Arizona 356 FTE
STATE-SIZE MCSAZ - 003 356 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valley Water Users 357 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arizona JBH Operation 357 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Baltimore-Washington Mkt Install 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Calipak, Inc 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 1144 15th Street 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Tarboro 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pepperidge Farm Inc. Lakeland Florida 356 FTE
NAT-SIZE Warwick Mechanical Group 356 FTE
NAT-SIZE Joseph M. Sanzari Inc 356 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1930 - Plainville 356 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.