Alcoholic beverage control boards · Arizona

Maricopa County - Planning and Development (440)

Phoenix, AZ · ~105 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maricopa County - Planning and Development (440) runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Alcoholic beverage control boards workplace, earning a grade A.

Maricopa County - Planning and Development (440): 0.9 TCR = 28% of Alcoholic beverage control boards BLS 3.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maricopa County - Planning and Development (440) safety composite

Maricopa County - Planning and Development (440) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2019→2024

Maricopa County - Planning and Development (440) injury rate improved

Maricopa County - Planning and Development (440)'s TCR fell 1.3 from 1.3 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.3 · 2020=1.1 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=1.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 926150 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P76
  • PHOTO 97390003-680000 DEPT…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~105 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 97390003-680000 DEPT. OF PERMITTING, INSP ENFORCEMENT (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Maricopa County - Planning and Development (440) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maricopa County - Planning and Development (440) averages 0.9 TCR (28% of the Alcoholic beverage control boards BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maricopa County - Planning and Development (440) TCR series: 2019=1.3 · 2020=1.1 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Maricopa County - Planning and Development (440) falls in its industry

70 Alcoholic beverage control boa establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Maricopa County - Planning and Development (440) (105 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Maricopa County - Planning and Development (440)
Maricopa County - Planning and Development (440) (105 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Maricopa County - Planning and Development (440) has more employees than the Alcoholic beverage control boards median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2022 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2020 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2019 1.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

926150 · AZ · Phoenix

70 Alcoholic beverage control boards employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 97390003-680000 DEPT. OF PERMITTING, INSP ENFORCEMENT 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dept. of Labor & Workforce Development (27) 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Building Safety Department 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Labor & Industries Building 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Elephant Head Farms 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hillphoenix AMS Phoenix 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tohono O O'dham Utility Authority 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE J. Banicki Construction, Inc. (Div of Sterling Construction) 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR National Oilwell Varco - Houston Rig Pressure Control - R&D 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR MMT Technology, Inc 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sews Ecsc 2 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Swagelok CRM 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lutco, Inc. 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advance Concrete 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bronson Lifestyle Improvement and Research Center 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE High Purity New England 105 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.