Auditor's offices, government · Arizona

Maricopa County - Risk Management (750)

Phoenix, AZ · ~24 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maricopa County - Risk Management (750) runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Auditor's offices, government workplace, earning a grade C.

Maricopa County - Risk Management (750): 0.0 TCR = 0% of Auditor's offices, government BLS 3.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maricopa County - Risk Management (750) safety composite

Maricopa County - Risk Management (750) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Maricopa County - Risk Management (750) held a steady TCR band

Maricopa County - Risk Management (750)'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.0 TCR.

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/82
  • PHOTO Clerk
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Clerk (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Maricopa County - Risk Management (750) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maricopa County - Risk Management (750) averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Auditor's offices, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maricopa County - Risk Management (750) TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Maricopa County - Risk Management (750) falls in its industry

1,496 Auditor's offices, government establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 82 Auditor's offices, government employers in Arizona.

Maricopa County - Risk Management (750) (24 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Maricopa County - Risk Management (750)
Maricopa County - Risk Management (750) (24 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Maricopa County - Risk Management (750) has fewer employees than the Auditor's offices, government median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · AZ · Phoenix

1,496 Auditor's offices, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Clerk 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Joaquin County Registrar of Voters 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Dubuque - Library 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Dubuque - Water Department 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rio Blanco, LLC - RBL332 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vasquez Brothers Inc. 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAES : OM - New Harquahala 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arlington Valley Energy Facility 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health 7000 and 7200 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cedar Bay Entertainment LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR One Federal Street 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Fremont - Community Support Includes Recreation and Human Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tire Distributor Xperts, LLC - Baton Rouge 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reamer Farms 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Absolute Grinding & Manufacturing, Inc. 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dartco Masonry, LLC 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.