Continuing care retirement communities · Ohio

Marjorie P. Lee Retirement Community

Cincinnati, OH · ~252 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Marjorie P. Lee Retirement Community runs at 56% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade B.

Marjorie P. Lee Retirement Community: 2.1 TCR = 56% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Marjorie P. Lee Retirement Community safety composite

Marjorie P. Lee Retirement Community scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2024

Marjorie P. Lee Retirement Community injury rate improved

Marjorie P. Lee Retirement Community's TCR fell 0.4 from 2.1 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.1 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=5.0 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Cincinnati, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 56% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #37/234
  • PHOTO Arlington Place of R…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~252 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arlington Place of Red Oak, II. Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Marjorie P. Lee Retirement Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Marjorie P. Lee Retirement Community averages 2.1 TCR (56% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Marjorie P. Lee Retirement Community TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=5 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Marjorie P. Lee Retirement Community falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 234 Continuing care retirement com employers in Ohio.

Marjorie P. Lee Retirement Community (252 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Marjorie P. Lee Retirement Community
Marjorie P. Lee Retirement Community (252 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Marjorie P. Lee Retirement Community has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 1.1 3 0 0
2023 2.4 2.4 4 0 0
2022 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2021 1.2 1.2 2 0 0
2020 3.3 2.8 4 2 0
2019 5.0 3.1 8 0 0
2018 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2016 2.1 1.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · OH · Cincinnati

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arlington Place of Red Oak, II. Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Focused Care at Midland 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ALARIS HEALTH AT THE ATRIUM 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Knollwood Place Apartments 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE AMS Construction Inc 252 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lorain Tubular 252 FTE
STATE-SIZE Superior Roll Forming LLC 252 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miba Sinter USA LLC 252 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Louis Dreyfus Company - Seattle 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR T. U. Parks Construction Company 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR BMR1 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 164-Columbia Marriott 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Howmet Aerospace Whitehall Operations - Plant 4 252 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lebanon 252 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grandville Printing Company 252 FTE
NAT-SIZE CRM Scottsdale AZ 252 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.