Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors · Florida

Mark Williams Construction

Sarasota, FL · ~113 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mark Williams Construction runs at 104% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Mark Williams Construction: 2.9 TCR = 104% of Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mark Williams Construction safety composite

Mark Williams Construction scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2016→2022

Mark Williams Construction injury rate improved

Mark Williams Construction's TCR fell 5.0 from 5.8 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.8 · 2017=6.4 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.8 · 2022=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · Sarasota, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 104% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #42/103
  • PHOTO Malcolm Drilling WA
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~113 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Malcolm Drilling WA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Mark Williams Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mark Williams Construction averages 2.9 TCR (104% of the Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mark Williams Construction TCR series: 2016=5.8 · 2017=6.4 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=0.8 · 2022=0.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Mark Williams Construction falls in its industry

1,314 Foundation, building, poured c establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 103 Foundation, building, poured c employers in Florida.

Mark Williams Construction (113 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mark Williams Construction
Mark Williams Construction (113 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Mark Williams Construction has more employees than the Foundation, building, poured concrete, c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.6 1.8 4 0 0
2017 6.4 3.8 5 0 0
2016 5.8 1.9 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · FL · Sarasota

1,314 Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 504 employers in Sarasota, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Malcolm Drilling WA 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tealstone Commercial, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Barlow Concrete Construction, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR A A Pittman & Sons Concrete Co Inc 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 8190-TECO 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE CFER Main 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE RAW-MIAMI 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Herzog Technologies, Inc. - HWR, A Joint Venture 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beneva Lakes 3,238 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Butterfly- Lakewood Ranch 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Connexis Physicians 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Treasures Thrift Shop II 2,476 FTE
NAT-TCR Country Inn & Suites - Phoenix AZ 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR TG Gallagher 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 4047 Devens Box Plant 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 002 Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Kaufman 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Flying A Pumping Services LLC, 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mahaney Group 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Superior Grocers #137 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE PCI Cincinnati Interior 113 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.