Shirts, underwear, men's and boys', cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) · Tennessee

Market Street, Main Office

Dayton, TN · ~120 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Market Street, Main Office runs at 37% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Shirts, underwear, men's and boys', cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) workplace, earning a grade A.

Market Street, Main Office: 1.2 TCR = 37% of Shirts, underwear, men's and boys', cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Market Street, Main Office safety composite

Market Street, Main Office scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2024

Market Street, Main Office injury rate improved

Market Street, Main Office's TCR fell 0.4 from 1.4 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.4 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 315220 · Dayton, TN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 37% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/6
  • PHOTO NSA Arkansas
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~120 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NSA Arkansas (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Market Street, Main Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Market Street, Main Office averages 1.2 TCR (37% of the Shirts, underwear, men's and boys', cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Market Street, Main Office TCR series: 2016=1.4 · 2024=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Market Street, Main Office falls in its industry

46 Shirts, underwear, men's and b establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 6 Shirts, underwear, men's and b employers in Tennessee.

Market Street, Main Office (120 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Market Street, Main Office
Market Street, Main Office (120 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Market Street, Main Office has more employees than the Shirts, underwear, men's and boys', cut median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2016 1.4 0.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

315220 · TN · Dayton

46 Shirts, underwear, men's and boys', cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 35 employers in Dayton, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NSA Arkansas 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR National Safety Apparel Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fechheimer Brothers Company 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Klim 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Knoxville 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE CECO Concrete Construction : Nashville 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE 001 Memphis TN Crane Sales and Service LLC 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nashville Stratas Foods 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR Allergy Clinic 6,606 FTE
CITY-NEAR SE Eye Specialist 6,606 FTE
CITY-NEAR La-Z-Boy, Inc. Tennessee 1,453 FTE
CITY-NEAR La-Z-Boy, Inc. 1,359 FTE
NAT-TCR The Art Institute of Chicago 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Neenah Technical Materials Govt 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Pipe Craft, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Aristeo Construction 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #0078 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lexington RSC 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hughes Anderson 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate Philadelphia 120 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.