Signs and signboards (except paper, paperboard) manufacturing · Wisconsin

Marking Services Inc.

Milwaukee, WI · ~141 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Marking Services Inc. runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Signs and signboards (except paper, paperboard) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Marking Services Inc.: 0.7 TCR = 20% of Signs and signboards (except paper, paperboard) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Marking Services Inc. safety composite

Marking Services Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2017→2024

Marking Services Inc. injury rate improved

Marking Services Inc.'s TCR fell 1.2 from 1.8 in 2017 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.0 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339950 · Milwaukee, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/26
  • PHOTO Atlas Sign Industrie…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~141 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Atlas Sign Industries - North Caroliina (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Marking Services Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Marking Services Inc. averages 0.7 TCR (20% of the Signs and signboards (except paper, paperboard) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Marking Services Inc. TCR series: 2017=1.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=1 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Marking Services Inc. falls in its industry

405 Signs and signboards (except p establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 26 Signs and signboards (except p employers in Wisconsin.

Marking Services Inc. (141 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Marking Services Inc.
Marking Services Inc. (141 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Marking Services Inc. has more employees than the Signs and signboards (except paper, pape median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.0 0 1 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2021 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.8 0.0 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339950 · WI · Milwaukee

405 Signs and signboards (except paper, paperboard) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 980 employers in Milwaukee, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Atlas Sign Industries - North Caroliina 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Keystone Display, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2/90 Sign Systems 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Czarnowski-Detroit 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Imperia Foods - Fall Creek 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nestle Nutrition 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sanimax USA LLC 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE Horseshoe Beverage Company 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center 7,587 FTE
CITY-NEAR FROEDTERT HOSPITAL 7,328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milwaukee Hospital 3,398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Childrens Hospital - Milw Campus 2,851 FTE
NAT-TCR Air Products and Chemicals Inc. LaSalle Facility 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Special School Dist St Louis C 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Birmingham Office 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Metals USA-Philadelphia Flat Rolled 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Building A 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stepan Company Northfield 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE C&B Marine 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kamal Corp. 141 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.