Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing · Oregon

Marks Metal Technology, INC

Name: Marks Metal Technology, INC Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Clackamas, OR · ~39 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 2.2
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Marks Metal Technology, INC runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Marks Metal Technology, INC: 2.2 TCR = 66% of Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Marks Metal Technology, INC safety composite

Marks Metal Technology, INC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): B 2.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2021→2022

Marks Metal Technology, INC injury rate improved

Marks Metal Technology, INC's TCR fell 4.3 from 4.3 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=4.3 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332313 · Clackamas, OR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 66% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #2/10
PHOTO Tampa Tank Inc
BOOK 2y book
INJ 2 inj
SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tampa Tank Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.2
Tampa Tank Inc

2.2
C&H Solutions

2.1
Petersen Inc.

2.1
Avkem US Mfg H

2.1

What this shows Marks Metal Technology, INC averages 2.2 TCR (66% of the Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Marks Metal Technology, INC TCR series: 2021=4.3 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Marks Metal Technology, INC falls in its industry

449 Plate work (e.g., bending, cut establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 10 Plate work (e.g., bending, cut employers in Oregon.

Marks Metal Technology, INC (39 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Marks Metal Technology, INC has fewer employees than the Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2022	0.0	0.0	0	0	0
2021	4.3	2.2	2	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332313 · OR · Clackamas

449 Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 144 employers in Clackamas, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Tampa Tank Inc	GIBSONTON, FL	2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	C&H Solutions HQ	AULT, CO	2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Petersen Inc.	OGDEN, UT	2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Avkem US Mfg HQ	LENOIR CITY, TN	2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Harney Rock and Paving Company	BURNS	39 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Rose City Operations Center	PORTLAND	39 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Coos Bay North Bend Water Board	COOS BAY	39 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Griffin Construction LLC	PRINEVILLE	39 FTE
CITY-NEAR	10810010 SUNNYSIDE MEDICAL CENTER SIM LAB	Clackamas	2,327 FTE
CITY-NEAR	2032-10810010	Clackamas	2,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR	2032-10110010	Clackamas	2,176 FTE
CITY-NEAR	422-DC001	Clackamas	942 FTE
NAT-TCR	TMS Braddock	Braddock, PA	2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Fort Polk Facilities Support Services	Fort Polk, LA	2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Bed Bath and Beyond College Station	College Station, TX	2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Bosch-Albion	Albion, IN	2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Burt Brothers - Farmington	Farmington, UT	39 FTE
NAT-SIZE	44935 - Jacksonville Fac.	Jacksonville, FL	39 FTE
NAT-SIZE	49814 - Alameda Fac.	San Leandro, CA	39 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Millbury Ma Depot	Millbury, MA	39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.