Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Wisconsin

Marla Vista

Green Bay, WI · ~44 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
23.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Marla Vista runs at 623% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Marla Vista: 23.7 TCR = 623% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Marla Vista safety composite

Marla Vista scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 23.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−19.6

2016→2018

Marla Vista injury rate improved

Marla Vista's TCR fell 19.6 from 42.8 in 2016 to 23.2 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 42.8 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=42.8 · 2017=5.1 · 2018=23.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Green Bay, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 23.7 · 623% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #269/273
  • PHOTO Cedar Village Assist…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cedar Village Assisted Living and Memory Care (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Marla Vista in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Marla Vista averages 23.7 TCR (623% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Marla Vista TCR series: 2016=42.8 · 2017=5.1 · 2018=23.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Marla Vista falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #269 safest of 273 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Wisconsin.

Marla Vista (44 employees, TCR 23.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Marla Vista
Marla Vista (44 employees, TCR 23.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Marla Vista has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 23.2 2.6 7 2 0
2017 5.1 5.1 2 0 0
2016 42.8 7.1 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WI · Green Bay

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 563 employers in Green Bay, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cedar Village Assisted Living and Memory Care 23.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR B-XIV Shelton LLC 23.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Newport Plaza 23.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kensington Hastings 23.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Crave Brothers Farm 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Holsum Elm Dairy 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Milwaukee South Shore 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE ARC Contracting of Wisconsin Inc 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI005 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,595 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,296 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital Campus 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR 300000170855522 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 2,379 FTE
NAT-TCR Brown-Forman Cooperage- Spencer Mill 23.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Gurnee Bickford 23.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Conwaste Recogido SJ Zona-2 23.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Brown Health and Rehabilitation 23.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ridgway 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goldsmith Terminal 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fas Mfe 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Presence Resurrection Retirement Community 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.