Hotels, resort, without casinos · California

Marriott Laguna Cliffs Resort & Spa

Dana Point, CA · ~261 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Marriott Laguna Cliffs Resort & Spa runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hotels, resort, without casinos workplace, earning a grade C.

Marriott Laguna Cliffs Resort & Spa: 3.6 TCR = 120% of Hotels, resort, without casinos BLS 3.0 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Marriott Laguna Cliffs Resort & Spa safety composite

Marriott Laguna Cliffs Resort & Spa scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2022

Marriott Laguna Cliffs Resort & Spa injury rate improved

Marriott Laguna Cliffs Resort & Spa's TCR fell 1.1 from 7.5 in 2016 to 6.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.5 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=6.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Dana Point, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 120% of ind

  • DART 6.5 DART
  • RANK #177/1298
  • PHOTO THAWH - Holiday Inn …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~261 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: THAWH - Holiday Inn Express Tullahoma (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Marriott Laguna Cliffs Resort & Spa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Marriott Laguna Cliffs Resort & Spa averages 3.6 TCR (120% of the Hotels, resort, without casinos BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Marriott Laguna Cliffs Resort & Spa TCR series: 2016=7.5 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=6.5 · BLS 3.0

Where Marriott Laguna Cliffs Resort & Spa falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels, resort, without casino establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #177 safest of 1298 Hotels, resort, without casino employers in California.

Marriott Laguna Cliffs Resort & Spa (261 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Marriott Laguna Cliffs Resort & Spa
Marriott Laguna Cliffs Resort & Spa (261 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Marriott Laguna Cliffs Resort & Spa has more employees than the Hotels, resort, without casinos median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.5 6.5 13 0 0
2021 3.5 2.6 4 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.4 3.4 8 0 0
2018 0.8 0.0 0 2 0
2016 7.5 2.5 17 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · CA · Dana Point

9,342 Hotels, resort, without casinos employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 26 employers in Dana Point, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR THAWH - Holiday Inn Express Tullahoma 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hampton Inn 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fort Collins Hilton 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ballantyne Village Hotels DBA: AC Hotel Charlotte Ballantyne 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE R & N PACKING LLC 261 FTE
STATE-SIZE SANTA CLARA FARMS LLC 261 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coffman Specialties, Inc. 261 FTE
STATE-SIZE Countywide Mechancial Systems, Inc. 261 FTE
CITY-NEAR KSL MBR Management II LLC 672 FTE
CITY-NEAR 45248 WALDORF ASTORIA MONARCH BEACH RESORT C 661 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4263-45248 537 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Ritz Carlton Laguna Niguel 486 FTE
NAT-TCR Royal Brass and Hose 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Maryland Tree 49490 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta Eagles 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale PN Clinic 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Madison Community Hospital d/b/a/ Madison Regional Health System 261 FTE
NAT-SIZE McAlester OK 261 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alexandria Transit Company 261 FTE
NAT-SIZE DFW Dallas Forth Worth International Airport 261 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.