Sign, building, erection · New Jersey

Marshall Industrial Technologies

Trenton, NJ · ~127 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Marshall Industrial Technologies runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Sign, building, erection workplace, earning a grade B.

Marshall Industrial Technologies: 1.5 TCR = 54% of Sign, building, erection BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Marshall Industrial Technologies safety composite

Marshall Industrial Technologies scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2017→2024

Marshall Industrial Technologies injury rate improved

Marshall Industrial Technologies's TCR fell 0.6 from 2.5 in 2017 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.5 · 2019=0.7 · 2021=0.9 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Trenton, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.5 · 54% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #15/36
  • PHOTO Espina Paving, Inc.
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~127 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Espina Paving, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Marshall Industrial Technologies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Marshall Industrial Technologies averages 1.5 TCR (54% of the Sign, building, erection BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Marshall Industrial Technologies TCR series: 2017=2.5 · 2019=0.7 · 2021=0.9 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Marshall Industrial Technologies falls in its industry

1,634 Sign, building, erection establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 36 Sign, building, erection employers in New Jersey.

Marshall Industrial Technologies (127 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Marshall Industrial Technologies
Marshall Industrial Technologies (127 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Marshall Industrial Technologies has more employees than the Sign, building, erection median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.9 2 0 0
2023 1.6 1.6 2 0 0
2021 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2019 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2017 2.5 1.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · NJ · Trenton

1,634 Sign, building, erection employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 99 employers in Trenton, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Espina Paving, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Apache - Marathon Petroleum 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CMC Traffic Control Specialists, Inc. dba CMC Construction 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Superior Scaffold Services Inc 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Viscofan USA Inc 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE PRESTIGE BREAD COMPANY OF JERSEY CITY INC 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE MANHEIM NY METRO SKYLINE 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Melissa & Doug, LLC (NJ Site) 127 FTE
CITY-NEAR CapitalHealth Regional Medical Center 2,060 FTE
CITY-NEAR Capital Health Regional Medical Center 2,022 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trenton Board of Education 1,641 FTE
CITY-NEAR Residential HVAC and Supply : MFG-Trenton, NJ-USA 1,135 FTE
NAT-TCR Summit Line Construction 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Chesterton - Groveland 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Grand Prairie 10049 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Planters Peanuts 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Server Products Inc 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE White S Path-Ma55 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bakersfield Ca 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schmitt Woodland Hills, Inc. 127 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.