Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication · Kentucky

Martha's Materials Inc.

Lexington, KY · ~31 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Martha's Materials Inc. runs at 195% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication workplace, earning a grade D.

Martha's Materials Inc.: 6.4 TCR = 195% of Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Martha's Materials Inc. safety composite

Martha's Materials Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.4

2016→2023

Martha's Materials Inc. injury rate improved

Martha's Materials Inc.'s TCR fell 14.4 from 14.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 14.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.4 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=6.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=11.9 · 2021=14.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Lexington, KY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 195% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/21
  • PHOTO IDEAL STEEL, LLC.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: IDEAL STEEL, LLC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Martha's Materials Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Martha's Materials Inc. averages 6.4 TCR (195% of the Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Martha's Materials Inc. TCR series: 2016=14.4 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=6.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=11.9 · 2021=14.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Martha's Materials Inc. falls in its industry

1,491 Concrete reinforcing bar (reba establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 21 Concrete reinforcing bar (reba employers in Kentucky.

Martha's Materials Inc. (31 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Martha's Materials Inc.
Martha's Materials Inc. (31 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Martha's Materials Inc. has fewer employees than the Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assembl median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 14.7 14.7 4 0 0
2020 11.9 7.9 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 6.9 6.9 2 0 0
2017 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2016 14.4 10.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · KY · Lexington

1,491 Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 652 employers in Lexington, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR IDEAL STEEL, LLC. 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Premier Fabrication 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vicon Fabricating 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advanced Welding and Steel 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hwy 64 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Big Sandy 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Carlisle 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Geothermal Earthworks Inc 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Kentucky - Main Campus - Fayette County 11,013 FTE
CITY-NEAR UK Healthcare 9,922 FTE
CITY-NEAR YMCA of Central KY - Gatton Beaumont 3,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR YMCA of Central Ky - High Street 3,895 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 1016 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Highway Materials, Inc. 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bath & Body Works - SB1 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR FL, RI Jacksonville Mayo 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Store 1432 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Divine House Inc. - Southern (Granite, Redwood, Marshall) 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tremont Ridge 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE JM Huber Marblehead IL 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.