Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Iowa

Martin Equipment - Cedar Rapids

Cedar Rapids, IA · ~20 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.4
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Martin Equipment - Cedar Rapids runs at 353% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

Martin Equipment - Cedar Rapids: 7.4 TCR = 353% of Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Martin Equipment - Cedar Rapids safety composite

Martin Equipment - Cedar Rapids scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Martin Equipment - Cedar Rapids: 4.9 → 9.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 9.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Martin Equipment - Cedar Rapids's TCR rose 5.0 from 4.9 in 2023 to 9.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Cedar Rapids, IA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.4 · 353% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #29/31
  • PHOTO ITW/Hobart Service-O…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ITW/Hobart Service-Orlando Branch (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

Martin Equipment - Cedar Rapids in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Martin Equipment - Cedar Rapids averages 7.4 TCR (353% of the Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Martin Equipment - Cedar Rapids TCR series: 2023=4.9 · 2024=9.9 · BLS 2.1

Where Martin Equipment - Cedar Rapids falls in its industry

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 31 Agricultural machinery and equ employers in Iowa.

Martin Equipment - Cedar Rapids (20 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Martin Equipment - Cedar Rapids
Martin Equipment - Cedar Rapids (20 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Martin Equipment - Cedar Rapids has fewer employees than the Agricultural machinery and equipment rep median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.9 0.0 2 0 0
2023 4.9 4.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · IA · Cedar Rapids

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 466 employers in Cedar Rapids, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ITW/Hobart Service-Orlando Branch 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Empire Truck Sales - Pensacola 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Newco Enterprises, Inc. dba Newco USA Industrial Services 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wiese Decatur 7.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Skyline Pork, LLC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE J-Six Farms Iowa 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Handlos Jacksonville 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newell Pig II 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockwell Collins (Cedar Rapids IA 400 NE) 6,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockwell Collins - Cedar Rapids C Ave 6,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR CRST EXPEDITED INC 3,475 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Methodist Hospital 2,949 FTE
NAT-TCR Nyhor - Hornell Center 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The Flying Butcher 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Springdale 10268 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 137 Route 130 Forestdale MA 02644 7.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Over the Top Roofing LLC 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Westside Hulling Association 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sedalia Service Center 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sands Plumbing, Inc. 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.