Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · California

Martinic Engineering, Inc- Stanton

Stanton, CA · ~45 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Martinic Engineering, Inc- Stanton runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Martinic Engineering, Inc- Stanton: 0.4 TCR = 12% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Martinic Engineering, Inc- Stanton safety composite

Martinic Engineering, Inc- Stanton scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Martinic Engineering, Inc- Stanton held a steady TCR band

Martinic Engineering, Inc- Stanton's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.6 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Stanton, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/104
  • PHOTO Ontic Engineering an…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ontic Engineering and Manufacturing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Martinic Engineering, Inc- Stanton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Martinic Engineering, Inc- Stanton averages 0.4 TCR (12% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Martinic Engineering, Inc- Stanton TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Martinic Engineering, Inc- Stanton falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 104 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in California.

Martinic Engineering, Inc- Stanton (45 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Martinic Engineering, Inc- Stanton
Martinic Engineering, Inc- Stanton (45 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Martinic Engineering, Inc- Stanton has fewer employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · CA · Stanton

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 35 employers in Stanton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ontic Engineering and Manufacturing 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goodrich Corporation (Spokane WA) 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fatigue Technology Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goodrich - Aircraft Wheels and Brakes - Norwalk 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Salinas Transplant Company 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Terra Firma Farm 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donald Beeman Farm 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berry Mist Farms, LP 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 394 846 FTE
CITY-NEAR CR&R Incorporated 580 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rowntree Gardens 317 FTE
CITY-NEAR Custom Pipe & Fabrication, Inc/ Stanton 128 FTE
NAT-TCR Unique Industries, Inc. - Philadelphia 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Four point Sheraton 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Conbraco Industries - Matthews 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bell - Plant 2 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Seretta Construction Texas, LLC 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tom Bihn, Inc 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Hill 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Memorial Medical Center of East Tx-San Augustine 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.