Centers, senior citizens' · New York

Maryhaven Center of Hope

Port Jefferson Station, NY · ~683 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maryhaven Center of Hope runs at 379% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Centers, senior citizens' workplace, earning a grade F.

Maryhaven Center of Hope: 14.4 TCR = 379% of Centers, senior citizens' BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maryhaven Center of Hope safety composite

Maryhaven Center of Hope scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2016→2023

Maryhaven Center of Hope injury rate improved

Maryhaven Center of Hope's TCR fell 1.6 from 17.1 in 2016 to 15.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 17.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=17.1 · 2017=12.3 · 2022=12.9 · 2023=15.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Port Jefferson Station, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 14.4 · 379% of ind

  • DART 12.3 DART
  • RANK #142/158
  • PHOTO Bronx 2 Day Hab Off…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 371 inj
  • SIZE ~683 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bronx 2 Day Hab Offices (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Maryhaven Center of Hope in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maryhaven Center of Hope averages 14.4 TCR (379% of the Centers, senior citizens' BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maryhaven Center of Hope TCR series: 2016=17.1 · 2017=12.3 · 2022=12.9 · 2023=15.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Maryhaven Center of Hope falls in its industry

1,320 Centers, senior citizens' establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #142 safest of 158 Centers, senior citizens' employers in New York.

Maryhaven Center of Hope (683 employees, TCR 14.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Maryhaven Center of Hope
Maryhaven Center of Hope (683 employees, TCR 14.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Maryhaven Center of Hope has more employees than the Centers, senior citizens' median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 15.4 12.3 48 30 0
2022 12.9 10.3 29 31 0
2017 12.3 4.4 123 0 0
2016 17.1 4.4 171 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · NY · Port Jefferson Station

1,320 Centers, senior citizens' employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 10 employers in Port Jefferson Station, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bronx 2 Day Hab Offices 14.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2084 West 16th Street 14.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Community Options Indiana PA 14.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lifesprk at Summit Place Senior Campus 14.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE kdc/one Port Jervis 683 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elecnor Hawkeye 682 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pinnacle Industries II, LLC. 684 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nice-Pak Prod. Inc / PDI Inc. 684 FTE
CITY-NEAR Uncle Giuseppe's Port Jefferson, Inc. 239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gallagher of Port Jefferson 196 FTE
CITY-NEAR Woodhaven Nursing Home 166 FTE
CITY-NEAR VJJ HOLDING CO LLC 129 FTE
NAT-TCR Pratt Health and Rehab 14.4 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Portage - Parks & Recreation and Parks & Streets Maintenance Division 14.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hinman-Davis, LLC 14.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Jewish Senior Services 14.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Solo Cup Company Dallas 683 FTE
NAT-SIZE Market Basket #32 683 FTE
NAT-SIZE Behlen Mfg. Co. 683 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cotton Commercial USA, Inc. 683 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.