Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors · Maryland

Maryland Sheeting and Shoring

Silver Spring, MD · ~217 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maryland Sheeting and Shoring runs at 237% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Maryland Sheeting and Shoring: 6.6 TCR = 237% of Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maryland Sheeting and Shoring safety composite

Maryland Sheeting and Shoring scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Maryland Sheeting and Shoring held a steady TCR band

Maryland Sheeting and Shoring's TCR held near 0.2 from 6.7 in 2017 to 6.9 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.89× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.7 · 2018=6.3 · 2019=6.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · Silver Spring, MD ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.6 · 237% of ind

  • DART 5.9 DART
  • RANK #28/30
  • PHOTO M and B Services LLC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~217 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: M and B Services LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Maryland Sheeting and Shoring in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maryland Sheeting and Shoring averages 6.6 TCR (237% of the Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maryland Sheeting and Shoring TCR series: 2017=6.7 · 2018=6.3 · 2019=6.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Maryland Sheeting and Shoring falls in its industry

1,314 Foundation, building, poured c establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 30 Foundation, building, poured c employers in Maryland.

Maryland Sheeting and Shoring (217 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Maryland Sheeting and Shoring
Maryland Sheeting and Shoring (217 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Maryland Sheeting and Shoring has more employees than the Foundation, building, poured concrete, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 6.9 5.9 14 0 0
2018 6.3 4.7 12 0 0
2017 6.7 5.4 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · MD · Silver Spring

1,314 Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 160 employers in Silver Spring, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR M and B Services LLC 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Black Rock Concrete 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Williams Brothers Construction Inc. 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Leo's Concrete Specialties,Inc 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE ACECO LLC 217 FTE
STATE-SIZE MD Judiciary - DC Baltimore City 217 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4818-MD10 218 FTE
STATE-SIZE 10463 Riverdale 216 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Cross Hospital-Silver Spring 3,228 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Cross Hospital-Silver Spring-HCH-MD 2,537 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adventist HealthCare, Inc., d/b/a Adventist HealthCare White Oak Medical Center 1,496 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riderwood Village 1,375 FTE
NAT-TCR Innocor Foam Technologies Brenham, LLC - Brenham 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR NHK Seating of America Tennessee 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Shot Gun, Inc. The Barrel Mill 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Midco Commercial 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE MIddlesex Health Care Center 217 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4813-48130009-Freeman Expo San Diego 217 FTE
NAT-SIZE Penn Engineering, Winston-Salem Division 217 FTE
NAT-SIZE UMC, Inc - Colorado 217 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.