Warehousing (including foreign trade zones), general merchandise · North Carolina

MAS Acme USA / MAS US Holdings

Asheboro, NC · ~237 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MAS Acme USA / MAS US Holdings runs at 80% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Warehousing (including foreign trade zones), general merchandise workplace, earning a grade C.

MAS Acme USA / MAS US Holdings: 4.7 TCR = 80% of Warehousing (including foreign trade zones), general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MAS Acme USA / MAS US Holdings safety composite

MAS Acme USA / MAS US Holdings scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

MAS Acme USA / MAS US Holdings: 3.5 → 5.8 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 5.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.83× in 2023

MAS Acme USA / MAS US Holdings's TCR rose 2.3 from 3.5 in 2019 to 5.8 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Asheboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.7 · 80% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #236/330
  • PHOTO Tosca - Salt Lake City
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~237 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tosca - Salt Lake City (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

MAS Acme USA / MAS US Holdings in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MAS Acme USA / MAS US Holdings averages 4.7 TCR (80% of the Warehousing (including foreign trade zones), general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MAS Acme USA / MAS US Holdings TCR series: 2019=3.5 · 2023=5.8 · BLS 5.8

Where MAS Acme USA / MAS US Holdings falls in its industry

9,477 Warehousing (including foreign establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #236 safest of 330 Warehousing (including foreign employers in North Carolina.

MAS Acme USA / MAS US Holdings (237 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate MAS Acme USA / MAS US Holdings
MAS Acme USA / MAS US Holdings (237 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

MAS Acme USA / MAS US Holdings has more employees than the Warehousing (including foreign trade zon median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.8 3.9 8 1 0
2019 3.5 3.5 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · NC · Asheboro

9,477 Warehousing (including foreign trade zones), general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 139 employers in Asheboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tosca - Salt Lake City 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ODW Logistics - Ric1 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 19110010-001090 USWHS VEYER-PLYMOUTH,MN 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corporate Pomona 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Charlotte Office 237 FTE
STATE-SIZE Salem Electric Company 237 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bowman Gray Technical Center 237 FTE
STATE-SIZE Commerical Screen Printing - Clothing 237 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8020236-Energizer/Asheboro 1,287 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8020236 Energizer Asheboro 654 FTE
CITY-NEAR Technimark, LLC Plant 5 633 FTE
CITY-NEAR Technimark LLC - Plant 5 466 FTE
NAT-TCR Unibloc-Pump, LLC 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #1597 BUFFALO, NY 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #5096 Independence, MO 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Moorhead 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Supported Living Group 237 FTE
NAT-SIZE Therm-O-Disc, Inc. 237 FTE
NAT-SIZE USM Store #555 (United) 237 FTE
NAT-SIZE BSL/BN Commons CCRC LLC 237 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.