Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing · Missouri

Masco Coatings Group St. Louis MFG

Imperial, MO · ~53 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Masco Coatings Group St. Louis MFG runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Masco Coatings Group St. Louis MFG: 1.9 TCR = 59% of Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Masco Coatings Group St. Louis MFG safety composite

Masco Coatings Group St. Louis MFG scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2016→2018

Masco Coatings Group St. Louis MFG injury rate improved

Masco Coatings Group St. Louis MFG's TCR fell 1.9 from 1.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.9 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.9 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325510 · Imperial, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 59% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/14
  • PHOTO USA OH Massillon Plant
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: USA OH Massillon Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Masco Coatings Group St. Louis MFG in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Masco Coatings Group St. Louis MFG averages 1.9 TCR (59% of the Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Masco Coatings Group St. Louis MFG TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Masco Coatings Group St. Louis MFG falls in its industry

530 Architectural coatings (i.e., establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 14 Architectural coatings (i.e., employers in Missouri.

Masco Coatings Group St. Louis MFG (53 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Masco Coatings Group St. Louis MFG
Masco Coatings Group St. Louis MFG (53 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Masco Coatings Group St. Louis MFG has fewer employees than the Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) man median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.9 1.9 2 0 0
2016 1.9 1.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325510 · MO · Imperial

530 Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 11 employers in Imperial, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR USA OH Massillon Plant 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ultimate Linings, LLC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chromaflo - Ashtabula 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glass Coatings & Concepts LLC 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE F&M Meter Building 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Underground District 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metering Services 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fortune Missouri 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Masco Coatings Group St. Louis Operations 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Behr Paint Company St. Louis Operations 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arnold Ready Mix Corp 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR H.W. Herrell Distributing Company 46 FTE
NAT-TCR CSH Warehouse Site 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR thyssenkrupp Industrial Services - Danville 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR ITG Brands, LLC Danville Tobacco Warehouse Facility 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Chase Farms - Arizona 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Office 71 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fruetel Associates 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Canton Dns 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pride of the Hills Mfg. of Wooster LLC 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.