Skilled nursing facilities · Texas

Mason Creek Transitional Care of Katy

Katy, TX · ~150 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mason Creek Transitional Care of Katy runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Mason Creek Transitional Care of Katy: 3.8 TCR = 58% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mason Creek Transitional Care of Katy safety composite

Mason Creek Transitional Care of Katy scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2019→2024

Mason Creek Transitional Care of Katy injury rate improved

Mason Creek Transitional Care of Katy's TCR fell 1.1 from 2.0 in 2019 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=2.0 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=8.8 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Katy, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.8 · 58% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #445/1034
  • PHOTO Arcadia Valley Skill…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~150 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arcadia Valley Skilled Nursing and Rehab (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Mason Creek Transitional Care of Katy in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mason Creek Transitional Care of Katy averages 3.8 TCR (58% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mason Creek Transitional Care of Katy TCR series: 2019=2 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=8.8 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Mason Creek Transitional Care of Katy falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #445 safest of 1034 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Texas.

Mason Creek Transitional Care of Katy (150 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mason Creek Transitional Care of Katy
Mason Creek Transitional Care of Katy (150 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Mason Creek Transitional Care of Katy has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2023 3.2 1.6 4 0 0
2022 8.8 7.8 9 0 0
2021 5.4 3.2 2 3 0
2020 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2019 2.0 2.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · TX · Katy

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 240 employers in Katy, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arcadia Valley Skilled Nursing and Rehab 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Emerald Trace 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Forest Hill Manor Health Care 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Progressive Lyndhurst, LLC 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coldwater Dairy 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE Champion Home Builders Mansfield 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vulcan Materials Company - DMG Paving & Grading 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ramco Erectors Inc 150 FTE
CITY-NEAR Manufacturing 2,743 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - HOU5 1,775 FTE
CITY-NEAR Igloo Products Corp 1,464 FTE
CITY-NEAR Katy DC - Katy TX 1,215 FTE
NAT-TCR Johnson Heater Corp 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Malco Products, Inc. Alliance 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Construction 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Carmi Manor 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Corporate 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Karl's Transport, Inc 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marcus L. Ward Home 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Careone at Livingston Snf 150 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.