Skilled nursing facilities · Pennsylvania

Masonic Village at Lafayette Hill

Lafayette Hill, PA · ~304 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Masonic Village at Lafayette Hill runs at 142% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Masonic Village at Lafayette Hill: 9.2 TCR = 142% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Masonic Village at Lafayette Hill safety composite

Masonic Village at Lafayette Hill scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 41% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2016→2024

Masonic Village at Lafayette Hill injury rate improved

Masonic Village at Lafayette Hill's TCR fell 1.8 from 6.3 in 2016 to 4.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 23.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.3 · 2017=3.4 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=23.8 · 2021=8.3 · 2022=21.4 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=4.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Lafayette Hill, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 9.2 · 142% of ind

  • DART 4.4 DART
  • RANK #505/754
  • PHOTO The Pearl of Elk Grove
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 59 inj
  • SIZE ~304 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Pearl of Elk Grove (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Masonic Village at Lafayette Hill in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Masonic Village at Lafayette Hill averages 9.2 TCR (142% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Masonic Village at Lafayette Hill TCR series: 2016=6.3 · 2017=3.4 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=23.8 · 2021=8.3 · 2022=21.4 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=4.4 · BLS 6.5

Where Masonic Village at Lafayette Hill falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #505 safest of 754 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Pennsylvania.

Masonic Village at Lafayette Hill (304 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Masonic Village at Lafayette Hill
Masonic Village at Lafayette Hill (304 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Masonic Village at Lafayette Hill has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.4 4.4 7 0 0
2023 1.9 1.9 3 0 0
2022 21.4 17.2 12 19 0
2021 8.3 7.1 11 2 0
2020 23.8 3.4 6 29 1
2019 4.2 4.2 6 0 0
2017 3.4 3.4 5 0 0
2016 6.3 6.3 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · PA · Lafayette Hill

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 15 employers in Lafayette Hill, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Pearl of Elk Grove 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jupiter Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carriage Hill Bethesda 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63332 9.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE HB McClure 304 FTE
STATE-SIZE Specialty Metals Plant 304 FTE
STATE-SIZE McLanahan Corporation 304 FTE
STATE-SIZE Leonardo DRS - Johnstown Facility 304 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meadowview Rehab and Nursing 323 FTE
CITY-NEAR Whitemarsh Continuing Care Retirement Community 306 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meadowview Rehab and Nursing ctr 303 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hajoca 099 107 FTE
NAT-TCR Foodservice Orlando - 1042 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 30 Granby 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Main Office 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 506SGE 9.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sioux Center Health 304 FTE
NAT-SIZE EMP 304 FTE
NAT-SIZE All Truck Transportation Co., Inc. 304 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mac Centro De Gobierno Edificio Angel Rivera Rodriguez Orh 12108 00 304 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.