Stonework (i.e., masonry) contractors · New Jersey

Masonry Preservation Group, Inc.

Pennsauken, NJ · ~38 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Masonry Preservation Group, Inc. runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Stonework (i.e., masonry) contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Masonry Preservation Group, Inc.: 1.8 TCR = 64% of Stonework (i.e., masonry) contractors BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Masonry Preservation Group, Inc. safety composite

Masonry Preservation Group, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.1

2018→2024

Masonry Preservation Group, Inc. injury rate improved

Masonry Preservation Group, Inc.'s TCR fell 9.1 from 9.1 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=9.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238140 · Pennsauken, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 64% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/7
  • PHOTO Great Lakes Restorat…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Great Lakes Restoration LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Masonry Preservation Group, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Masonry Preservation Group, Inc. averages 1.8 TCR (64% of the Stonework (i.e., masonry) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Masonry Preservation Group, Inc. TCR series: 2018=9.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Masonry Preservation Group, Inc. falls in its industry

703 Stonework (i.e., masonry) cont establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 7 Stonework (i.e., masonry) cont employers in New Jersey.

Masonry Preservation Group, Inc. (38 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Masonry Preservation Group, Inc.
Masonry Preservation Group, Inc. (38 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Masonry Preservation Group, Inc. has fewer employees than the Stonework (i.e., masonry) contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 9.1 6.1 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238140 · NJ · Pennsauken

703 Stonework (i.e., masonry) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 110 employers in Pennsauken, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Great Lakes Restoration LLC 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Veazey Enterprises, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Accurate Masonry 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stonelake Masonry, Inc. 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE South Jersey Gas-Waterford 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE JSH & Sons, LLC 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE NJN 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paulsboro Refining Company 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR J&J Snack Foods 528 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1964-00010110 366 FTE
CITY-NEAR AVL - NJ Headquarters 323 FTE
CITY-NEAR DIY - NJ Headquarters 298 FTE
NAT-TCR The Emergency Clinic Alamo Heights 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR CEC Environmental 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Veazey Enterprises, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Green Mountain Monogram 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE OGS Technologies, LLC 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raymow Construction Co., Inc. 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE E.L. Shea, Inc. 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blackmon Mooring of Tulsa LLC 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.