Signs and signboards (except paper, paperboard) manufacturing · Indiana

Masters Architectural Graphics d/b/a ASI

Indianapolis, IN · ~27 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Masters Architectural Graphics d/b/a ASI runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Signs and signboards (except paper, paperboard) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Masters Architectural Graphics d/b/a ASI: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Signs and signboards (except paper, paperboard) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Masters Architectural Graphics d/b/a ASI safety composite

Masters Architectural Graphics d/b/a ASI scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Masters Architectural Graphics d/b/a ASI held a steady TCR band

Masters Architectural Graphics d/b/a ASI's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.0 TCR.

2017=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339950 · Indianapolis, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/5
  • PHOTO CONCEPT UNLIMITED INC.
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CONCEPT UNLIMITED INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Masters Architectural Graphics d/b/a ASI in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Masters Architectural Graphics d/b/a ASI averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Signs and signboards (except paper, paperboard) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Masters Architectural Graphics d/b/a ASI TCR series: 2017=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Masters Architectural Graphics d/b/a ASI falls in its industry

405 Signs and signboards (except p establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 5 Signs and signboards (except p employers in Indiana.

Masters Architectural Graphics d/b/a ASI (27 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Masters Architectural Graphics d/b/a ASI
Masters Architectural Graphics d/b/a ASI (27 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Masters Architectural Graphics d/b/a ASI has fewer employees than the Signs and signboards (except paper, pape median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339950 · IN · Indianapolis

405 Signs and signboards (except paper, paperboard) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CONCEPT UNLIMITED INC. 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Everbrite LLC 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR RTC Industries, INC. 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR RTC Industries 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fischer Seeds 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Strauss Feed Mill 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE National Fuel Production of Michigan 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE National Energy of McBain 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Atlanta - Phipps 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer 208 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Binghamton 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Detroit 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Thompson Excavation Ltd. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jackson Builders, Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amsterdam Ready Mix 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Edencrest Legacy 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.