Resins, plastics (except custom compounding purchased resins), manufacturing · California

Materia, Inc. Pasadena Facility

Pasadena, CA · ~64 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Materia, Inc. Pasadena Facility runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Resins, plastics (except custom compounding purchased resins), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Materia, Inc. Pasadena Facility: 2.6 TCR = 78% of Resins, plastics (except custom compounding purchased resins), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Materia, Inc. Pasadena Facility safety composite

Materia, Inc. Pasadena Facility scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2018→2020

Materia, Inc. Pasadena Facility injury rate improved

Materia, Inc. Pasadena Facility's TCR fell 2.3 from 4.2 in 2018 to 1.9 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.2 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325211 · Pasadena, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 78% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/30
  • PHOTO Avient - Bethel
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Avient - Bethel (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Materia, Inc. Pasadena Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Materia, Inc. Pasadena Facility averages 2.6 TCR (78% of the Resins, plastics (except custom compounding purchased resins), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Materia, Inc. Pasadena Facility TCR series: 2018=4.2 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=1.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Materia, Inc. Pasadena Facility falls in its industry

644 Resins, plastics (except custo establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 30 Resins, plastics (except custo employers in California.

Materia, Inc. Pasadena Facility (64 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Materia, Inc. Pasadena Facility
Materia, Inc. Pasadena Facility (64 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Materia, Inc. Pasadena Facility has fewer employees than the Resins, plastics (except custom compound median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2018 4.2 2.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325211 · CA · Pasadena

644 Resins, plastics (except custom compounding purchased resins), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 195 employers in Pasadena, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Avient - Bethel 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mitsubishi Chemical America, Performance Polymers 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MCAM 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Basf Malcom 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Costa Farms, Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE MDERA 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGS FARM LABOR CORPORATION 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arroyo Seco Vineyards, Inc 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR ACCO Engineered Systems 4,604 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2313-00000001 4,175 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Pasadena 2,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Huntington Hospital 2,228 FTE
NAT-TCR Artistic Dental Laboratories, Inc. Bolingbrook Location 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Maxcess - Menges 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Leon E Wintermyer, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 346 Mishawaka, in 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Innova - Griffith Foods 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5071 - NV Washoe County Sheriff's Office 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dayton Hospice 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cincinnati Hospice 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.