Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors · California

Matrix Forming Inc.

Encinitas, CA · ~24 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Matrix Forming Inc. runs at 176% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Matrix Forming Inc.: 4.9 TCR = 176% of Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Matrix Forming Inc. safety composite

Matrix Forming Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.4

2017→2024

Matrix Forming Inc. injury rate improved

Matrix Forming Inc.'s TCR fell 5.4 from 9.6 in 2017 to 4.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.6 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=9.4 · 2021=5.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · Encinitas, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 176% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #93/166
  • PHOTO Gonsalves and Santuc…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gonsalves and Santucci, Inc. dba: The Conco Companies (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Matrix Forming Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Matrix Forming Inc. averages 4.9 TCR (176% of the Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Matrix Forming Inc. TCR series: 2017=9.6 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=9.4 · 2021=5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 2.8

Where Matrix Forming Inc. falls in its industry

1,314 Foundation, building, poured c establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #93 safest of 166 Foundation, building, poured c employers in California.

Matrix Forming Inc. (24 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Matrix Forming Inc.
Matrix Forming Inc. (24 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Matrix Forming Inc. has fewer employees than the Foundation, building, poured concrete, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 4.2 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.0 5.0 1 0 0
2020 9.4 6.3 3 0 0
2019 5.6 0.0 2 0 0
2018 5.5 5.5 1 0 0
2017 9.6 9.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · CA · Encinitas

1,314 Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 57 employers in Encinitas, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gonsalves and Santucci, Inc. dba: The Conco Companies 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR E&M Contractors, LLC 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southeast Concrete Construction 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR W.W. Clyde & Co. - Hawaii 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Agro-Jal Farming Enterprises 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE MTD Farms 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marc Pura Ranch, LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Costa Farms 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2261-00000320 1,706 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dudek 810 FTE
CITY-NEAR Magdalena Ecke Family YMCA 467 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1029 - Encinitas 284 FTE
NAT-TCR Plant Engineering 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Specialty Moving Systems 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Arrow Fastener Co.,LLC 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR GFC Crane Consultants, Inc. 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stone Central - Cortland 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE 50075 - Capstone Unfi Chesterfield 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE 50087 - Capstone Unfi Sturtevant 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spirit Lake Operating 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.