Bronze foundries (except die-casting) · Pennsylvania

Matthews International Corporation

Pittsburgh, PA · ~283 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Matthews International Corporation runs at 100% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Bronze foundries (except die-casting) workplace, earning a grade C.

Matthews International Corporation: 3.3 TCR = 100% of Bronze foundries (except die-casting) BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Matthews International Corporation safety composite

Matthews International Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Matthews International Corporation: 3.3 → 3.7 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 3.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.75× in 2019

Matthews International Corporation's TCR rose 0.4 from 3.3 in 2016 to 3.7 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331529 · Pittsburgh, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 100% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #3/12
  • PHOTO Hildreth MFG LLC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~283 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hildreth MFG LLC (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Matthews International Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Matthews International Corporation averages 3.3 TCR (100% of the Bronze foundries (except die-casting) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Matthews International Corporation TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=3.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Matthews International Corporation falls in its industry

124 Bronze foundries (except die-c establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 12 Bronze foundries (except die-c employers in Pennsylvania.

Matthews International Corporation (283 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Matthews International Corporation
Matthews International Corporation (283 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 5.4

Matthews International Corporation has more employees than the Bronze foundries (except die-casting) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.7 2.5 9 3 0
2018 2.7 1.5 7 2 0
2017 3.5 1.9 10 1 0
2016 3.3 2.2 6 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331529 · PA · Pittsburgh

124 Bronze foundries (except die-casting) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hildreth MFG LLC 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MBAF 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sloan Valve 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Concast Birmingham Inc 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pittsburgh Glass Works 283 FTE
STATE-SIZE Matthews International Corporation - Pittsburgh Bronze 283 FTE
STATE-SIZE AirBorn Lake City 283 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 4348 283 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR 14 - Roanoke, L-burg, M-ville, W-City, & W-ville 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hacienda Rehabilitation and Health Care Center, Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbia Electric Supply (PC8185) 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Northeast AL Division 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Richmond, IL 283 FTE
NAT-SIZE R&K Building Supplies 283 FTE
NAT-SIZE Astro Pak Corporation 283 FTE
NAT-SIZE MGRC Livermore 283 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.