Fiber drums made from purchased paperboard · North Carolina

Mauser Packaging Solutions Charlotte Fiber Plant

Charlotte, NC · ~38 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mauser Packaging Solutions Charlotte Fiber Plant runs at 167% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fiber drums made from purchased paperboard workplace, earning a grade D.

Mauser Packaging Solutions Charlotte Fiber Plant: 5.5 TCR = 167% of Fiber drums made from purchased paperboard BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mauser Packaging Solutions Charlotte Fiber Plant safety composite

Mauser Packaging Solutions Charlotte Fiber Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mauser Packaging Solutions Charlotte Fiber Plant: 0.0 → 11.0 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 11.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.5× in 2019

Mauser Packaging Solutions Charlotte Fiber Plant's TCR rose 11.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 11.0 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322219 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 167% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #5/6
  • PHOTO Cores & Tubes
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cores & Tubes (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Mauser Packaging Solutions Charlotte Fiber Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mauser Packaging Solutions Charlotte Fiber Plant averages 5.5 TCR (167% of the Fiber drums made from purchased paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mauser Packaging Solutions Charlotte Fiber Plant TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=11 · BLS 3.3

Where Mauser Packaging Solutions Charlotte Fiber Plant falls in its industry

140 Fiber drums made from purchase establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 6 Fiber drums made from purchase employers in North Carolina.

Mauser Packaging Solutions Charlotte Fiber Plant (38 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mauser Packaging Solutions Charlotte Fiber Plant
Mauser Packaging Solutions Charlotte Fiber Plant (38 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Mauser Packaging Solutions Charlotte Fiber Plant has fewer employees than the Fiber drums made from purchased paperboa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 11.0 2.8 3 1 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322219 · NC · Charlotte

140 Fiber drums made from purchased paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cores & Tubes 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Core Converting Operations 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sun America LLC 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Factory 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Morganton Hatchery 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harris Energy & Environmental Center 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enerdyne Power Systems, Inc 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Utilities (8100) 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR 0000000701 Transit-School 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Autotrol Corporation 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR #500 Lawrenceville Shoprite 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Curry Supply Co 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rcs Ks 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Moser's Foods #1 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE TCHO Ventures 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Covanta MacArthur Renewable Energy, Inc. 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.