Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors · Wisconsin

Mavid Construction Sevices LLC

Green Bay, WI · ~80 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mavid Construction Sevices LLC runs at 87% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Mavid Construction Sevices LLC: 2.5 TCR = 87% of Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mavid Construction Sevices LLC safety composite

Mavid Construction Sevices LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Mavid Construction Sevices LLC held a steady TCR band

Mavid Construction Sevices LLC's TCR held near 0.3 from 2.7 in 2019 to 2.4 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.94× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=2.7 · 2020=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Green Bay, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.5 · 87% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #16/26
  • PHOTO Jackson Contractor G…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jackson Contractor Group, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Mavid Construction Sevices LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mavid Construction Sevices LLC averages 2.5 TCR (87% of the Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mavid Construction Sevices LLC TCR series: 2019=2.7 · 2020=2.4 · BLS 2.9

Where Mavid Construction Sevices LLC falls in its industry

924 Industrial building (except wa establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 26 Industrial building (except wa employers in Wisconsin.

Mavid Construction Sevices LLC (80 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mavid Construction Sevices LLC
Mavid Construction Sevices LLC (80 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Mavid Construction Sevices LLC has more employees than the Industrial building (except warehouses) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.4 2.4 2 0 0
2019 2.7 2.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · WI · Green Bay

924 Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 563 employers in Green Bay, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jackson Contractor Group, Inc 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fabrication Specialties Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nova Pressroom Products LLC 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CR Meyer - Green Bay 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lexington Homes 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bob Anderson Builders, Inc. 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Infinity Exteriors LLC 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Interstate Roofing and Waterproofing, Inc. 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI005 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,595 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,296 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital Campus 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR 300000170855522 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 2,379 FTE
NAT-TCR McCauley Bros. Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR James R. Glidewell Dental Ceramics - BDL 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sterling Transportation Services, Inc. - Blair, NE 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR SCSII, AJV Company 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Copenhaver Construction 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Griffiths Corporation 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Museum 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodlands Creek Retirement 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.